Shape clustering in post optical character recognition processing

ABSTRACT

Systems, methods and computer program products on storage devices for shape clustering and applications in processing various documents, including an output of an optical character recognition (OCR) process. The output of an OCR process is classified into a plurality of clusters of clip images and a representative image for each cluster is generated to identify clusters whose clip images were incorrectly assigned character codes by the OCR process.

BACKGROUND

This specification relates to shape clustering and optical characterrecognition.

Optical character recognition (OCR) uses computer software, which willbe referred to generically as an OCR engine, to process digital imagesof printed, typewritten, handwritten, or other written text, whetheroriginally on paper, microfilm, or other medium, and to produce machinerecognizable and editable text from the images. The digital image of adocument processed by an OCR engine may include images of multiple pagesof written material. The images of the text to be processed by the OCRengine may be obtained by various imaging methods including using animage scanner to capture digital images of the text.

An OCR engine generally produces rectangular bounding boxes intended toenclose collectively the text written on each page. Generally, when thedocument image has gray scale or color information, the OCR enginebinarizes the image so that each image pixel is determined to be eithera foreground pixel (e.g., black text) or a background pixel (e.g., awhite region). Each bounding box normally encloses one or more connectedgroups of text pixels of one character perceived by the OCR engine, butmay also overlap part of, or in extreme cases all of, an adjacentcharacter. In such situations, several methods exist to separate thepixels identified by the OCR engine as belonging to the interior of thebounding box from those that belong to a different but overlappingbounding box. These methods include: generating mask images bythresholding and connected component analysis, constructing outlinepolygons, and constructing parallelogram bounding boxes. An OCR enginegenerally assigns to each bounding box one or more OCR character codes.Each OCR code identifies one or more characters that the engine hasrecognized in the bounding box. If an OCR engine fails to recognize anycharacter in a bounding box, it may assign no OCR character code to thebounding box. Each character identified by an OCR character code can berepresented in a standard character encoding, e.g., an ASCII or Unicodeencoding.

Each bounding box can be thought of as a clipping path that isolates aportion or small image of the document image, whether in an originalform or a binarized binary form. Because these small images can bethought of as being clipped from the document image by their respectivebounding boxes, these small images will be referred to as clips or clipimages. Because each clip image is tied to a bounding box, the OCRcharacter code or codes, and hence the character or characters, assignedto a bounding box can also be referred to or identified as the codes orthe characters assigned to the clip image. Unless otherwise noted, theterm clip or clip image will refer to an image that is a portion of adocument image and that is processed for character recognition by an OCRengine.

An OCR engine may make errors during the processing. For example, an OCRengine may improperly segment the original image by, e.g., includingonly a portion of a character in a bounding box or including multiplecharacters that are recognized as a single character in a singlebounding box. As another example, an OCR engine may assign an incorrectOCR character code to a bounding box due to some image similaritybetween the clip image enclosed by the bounding box and a referenceimage for a different character code or due to poor image quality of thedigital images received by the OCR engine.

SUMMARY

This specification describes, among others, techniques for shapeclustering and applications in processing various documents, includingan output of an optical character recognition (OCR) process.

In one aspect, a method can include the following: classifying clipimages defined in a received OCR output of a document processed by anOCR process into clusters of clip images; processing clip images in eachof the clusters to generate a cluster image for each cluster; comparingthe cluster images to detect clusters to which one or more OCR charactercodes were erroneously assigned by the OCR process; assigning one ormore new OCR character codes to a first cluster that is detected to havean erroneously assigned one or more OCR character codes in the OCRoutput; and using the one or more new OCR character codes to replace theerroneously assigned OCR character code at each occurrence of one of theclip images of the first cluster in the OCR output to produce a modifiedOCR output. Each cluster includes clip images that are assigned the sameone or more characters codes by the OCR process.

In another aspect, a system for optical character recognition (OCR) caninclude an OCR engine and a post-OCR engine. The OCR engine is operableto process an original image of a document to produce an OCR outputincluding clip images extracted from the original image and to assignone or more characters to each clip image. The post-OCR engine isoperable to classify clip images the OCR output into clusters of clipimages. Each cluster includes clip images that are assigned the same oneor more characters codes by the OCR engine. The post-OCR engine isoperable to process clip images in each of the clusters to generate acluster image for each cluster and compare the cluster images to detectclusters to which one or more OCR character codes were erroneouslyassigned by the OCR engine. The post-OCR engine is further operable toassign one or more new OCR character codes to a first cluster that isdetected to have an erroneously assigned one or more OCR character codesin the OCR output, and use the one or more new OCR character codes toreplace the erroneously assigned OCR character code at each occurrenceof one of the clip images of the first cluster in the OCR output toproduce a modified OCR output.

In another aspect, a method for post optical character recognition (OCR)processing can include classifying clip images defined in a received OCRoutput of a document processed by an optical character recognition (OCR)process into clusters of clip images; processing clip images in each ofthe clusters to generate a cluster image for each cluster. Each clusterincludes clip images that are identical or similar in size and areassigned the same one or more characters codes by the OCR process. For afirst cluster assigned one or more first OCR character codes, thismethod identifies: (1) a second cluster assigned one or more second OCRcharacter codes different from the one or more first OCR charactercodes, where the cluster image of the second cluster is closer in shapeto a cluster image of the first cluster than to cluster images of otherclusters assigned one or more OCR characters different from the one ormore first OCR character codes, and (2) a third cluster assigned thesame one or more first OCR character codes as the first cluster, wherethe cluster image of the third cluster is closer in shape to the clusterimage of the first cluster than to the cluster images of other clustersassigned the one or more first OCR character codes. This method uses atleast shape differences between the cluster images of the first clusterand the second cluster and between the cluster images of the firstcluster and the third cluster to determine a level of confidence in theone or more first OCR character codes assigned to the first cluster.

In another aspect, a system for optical character recognition (OCR) caninclude an OCR engine and a post-OCR engine. The OCR engine is operableto process an original image of a document to produce an OCR outputincluding clip images extracted from the original image and to assignone or more characters to each clip image; and a post-OCR engineoperable to classify clip images in the OCR output into clusters of clipimages. Each cluster includes clip images that are identical or similarin size and are assigned the same one or more characters codes by theOCR engine. The post-OCR engine is operable to process clip images ineach of the clusters to generate a cluster image for each cluster. Thepost-OCR engine is also operable to identify, for a first clusterassigned one or more first OCR character codes, (1) a second clusterassigned one or more second OCR character codes different from the oneor more first OCR character codes, where the cluster image of the secondcluster is closer in shape to a cluster image of the first cluster thanto cluster images of other clusters assigned one or more OCR charactersdifferent from the one or more first OCR character codes, and (2) athird cluster assigned the same one or more first OCR character codes asthe first cluster, where the cluster image of the third cluster iscloser in shape to the cluster image of the first cluster than to thecluster images of other clusters assigned the one or more first OCRcharacter codes. In this system, the post-OCR engine is operable to useat least shape differences between the cluster images of the firstcluster and the second cluster and between the cluster images of thefirst cluster and the third cluster to determine a level of confidencein the one or more first OCR character codes assigned to the firstcluster.

In another aspect, a system for optical character recognition (OCR) caninclude a cluster generation engine and a cluster processing engine. Thecluster generation engine is operable to receive an OCR output havingseparated images produced by an OCR engine in processing an originalimage of a document and one or more characters assigned to eachseparated image by the OCR engine. The cluster generation engine isoperable to classify the separated images in the OCR output intoclusters of separated images that are of a particular image size and areassigned the same one or more OCR character codes by the OCR engine. Thecluster processing engine is operable to obtain shape metric distancesbetween a cluster image of a cluster and cluster images of otherclusters and to detect whether an error exists in assignment of one ormore OCR character codes assigned to each cluster by the OCR enginebased on the obtained shape metric distances. The cluster processingengine is further operable to correct one or more erroneously assignedOCR character codes for a cluster.

In another aspect, a method for optical character recognition (OCR) caninclude receiving an OCR output having separated images produced by anOCR engine in processing an original image of a document and one or morecharacters assigned to each separated image by the OCR engine,classifying the separated images in the OCR output into clusters ofseparated images that are of a particular image size and are assignedthe same one or more OCR character codes by the OCR engine; obtainingshape metric distances between a cluster image of a cluster and clusterimages of other clusters and to detect whether an error exists inassignment of one or more OCR character codes assigned to each clusterby the OCR engine based on the obtained shape metric distances; andcorrecting one or more erroneously assigned OCR character codes for acluster.

In another aspect, a method can include classifying clip images definedin a received OCR output, from an optical character recognition (OCR)process that processes an original document image, into clusters of clipimages. Each cluster includes clip images of identical or similar imagesizes and shapes that are assigned the same one or more particularcharacters by the OCR process. Gray scale or color information from theoriginal document image is applied in averaging clip images in eachcluster to generate an averaged image for each cluster.

In another aspect, a system for optical character recognition (OCR) caninclude an OCR engine and a post-OCR engine. The OCR engine is operableto process an original image of a document to produce an OCR outputhaving clip images extracted from the original image and to assign oneor more characters to each clip image. The post-OCR engine is operableto classify clip images in the OCR output into clusters of clip images.Each cluster includes clip images of identical or similar image sizesand shapes that are assigned the same one or more particular charactersby the OCR engine. The post-OCR engine is operable to apply gray scaleor color information from the original document image in averaging clipimages in each cluster to generate an averaged image for each cluster.

In another aspect, a method for processing output from an opticalcharacter recognition (OCR) process can include classifying separatedimages in an output of the OCR process generated from processing anoriginal image of a document into clusters of separated images; using acluster image to represent separated images in a respective cluster;selecting a cluster which has a low level of confidence to obtain amanual assignment of one or more characters with the cluster image ofthe selected cluster; and using the one or more characters obtained bythe manual assignment to verify or replace respective one or moreparticular characters previously assigned by the OCR process in theoutput of the OCR process. In this method, each cluster includesseparated images of similar image sizes and shapes that are assigned thesame one or more particular characters by the OCR process.

In another aspect, a system for optical character recognition (OCR) caninclude an OCR engine and a post-OCR engine. The OCR engine is operableto process an original image of a document to produce separated imagesextracted from the original image and assign one or more characters toeach separated image. The post-OCR engine is operable to classifyseparated images in the OCR output into clusters of separated images.Each cluster includes separated images of similar image sizes and shapesthat are assigned the same one or more particular characters by the OCRengine. The post-OCR engine is operable to generate a cluster image torepresent separated images in a respective cluster, select a clusterwhich has a low level of confidence to obtain a manual assignment of oneor more characters with the cluster image of the selected cluster, anduse the one or more characters obtained by the manual assignment toverify or replace respective one or more particular characterspreviously assigned by the OCR engine.

In another aspect, a method can include classifying clip images definedin a received OCR output of a document processed by an optical characterrecognition (OCR) process into clusters of clip images; generating acluster image to represent clip images in each cluster; selecting acluster image of a particular cluster as part of an on-linechallenge-response test to solicit a user identification of the clusterimage of the particular cluster; and using the user identificationreceived from the on-line challenge-response test to verify or correctone or more particular characters assigned to the particular cluster bythe OCR process. In this method, each cluster includes clip images ofsimilar image sizes and shapes that are assigned the same one or moreparticular characters by the OCR process.

In another aspect, a method can include classifying clip images definedin a received OCR output of a document processed by an optical characterrecognition (OCR) process into clusters of clip images; using a clusterimage to represent clip images in each cluster; using an on-line game tosupply a cluster image of a particular cluster to one or more users ofthe on-line game for a user response as part of the on-line game; andusing the user response received from the on-line game to verify orcorrect one or more particular characters assigned to the particularcluster by the OCR process. In this method, each cluster includes clipimages of similar image sizes and shapes that are assigned the same oneor more particular characters by the OCR process.

In another aspect, a system for optical character recognition (OCR), caninclude OCR engines, post-OCR processing engines and a vote processingengine. Each OCR engine is operable to process an original image of adocument and to produce a respective OCR output. Each post-OCRprocessing engines is operable to receive an OCR output from arespective OCR engine and operable to produce a respective modified OCRoutput of the document. The vote processing engine is operable to selectportions from the modified OCR outputs and to assemble the selectedportions into a final OCR output for the document. Each post-OCRprocessing engine is operable to classify clip images defined in areceived OCR output for the document into clusters of clip images andeach cluster includes clip images of similar image sizes and shapes thatare assigned the same one or more particular characters by thecorresponding OCR engine. Each post-OCR engine is operable to generate acluster image to represent clip images in each cluster. The voteprocessing engine is operable to use shape differences between a clusterimage of each cluster and cluster images of other clusters to detectwhether an error exists in the one or more particular charactersassigned to each cluster by the corresponding OCR engine; correct eachdetected error in a particular cluster by newly assigning one or moreparticular characters to the particular cluster; and use the newlyassigned one or more particular characters for the particular cluster toreplace respective one or more particular characters previously assignedby the corresponding OCR engine in a corresponding modified OCR output.

In another aspect, a method for optical character recognition (OCR) caninclude using OCR engines to process an original image of a document andto produce OCR outputs, respectively; processing each of the OCR outputsseparately from processing other OCR output to produce a respectivemodified OCR output of the document. the processing including:classifying clip images defined in a received OCR output for thedocument into clusters of clip images, generating a cluster image torepresent clip images in each cluster, using shape differences between acluster image of each cluster and cluster images of other clusters todetect whether an error exists in the one or more particular charactersassigned to each cluster by the corresponding OCR engine. Each clusterincludes clip images of similar image sizes and shapes that are assignedthe same one or more particular characters by the corresponding OCRengine. This method further includes correcting each detected error in aparticular cluster by newly assigning one or more particular charactersto the particular cluster, using the newly assigned one or moreparticular characters for the particular cluster to replace respectiveone or more particular characters previously assigned by thecorresponding OCR engine in a corresponding modified OCR output; andselecting portions from the modified OCR outputs and to assemble theselected portions into a final OCR output for the document.

In another aspect, a method can include processing a document image witha first optical character recognition (OCR) engine to generate first OCRoutput and processing the document image with a second OCR engine togenerate second OCR output. The first OCR output includes first boundingboxes identifying first clip images located in the document image andrespective one or more characters assigned to each first clip image. Thesecond OCR output includes second bounding boxes identifying second clipimages located in the document image and respective one or morecharacters assigned to each second clip image. This method furtherincludes applying shape clustering to the first OCR output to producefirst clusters with first clip images and a respective confidence scorefor each assignment of one or more characters to a first clip image;applying shape clustering to the second OCR output to produce secondclusters with second clip images and a respective confidence score foreach assignment of one or more characters to a second clip image; andgenerating a final OCR output from the first OCR output and the secondOCR output. The final OCR output includes bounding boxes and using theconfidence scores for assignments of the one or more characters to thefirst clip images and the second clip images to select and assignrespective one or more characters to each of the bounding boxes.

In another aspect, a system for optical character recognition (OCR) caninclude a first OCR engine, a first post-OCR engine, a second OCRengine, a second post-OCR engine and a vote processing engine. The firstOCR engine is operable to process a document image to generate first OCRoutput which includes first bounding boxes identifying first clip imageslocated in the document image and respective one or more charactersassigned to each first clip image. The first post-OCR engine is operableto apply shape clustering to the first OCR output to produce firstclusters with first clip images and a respective confidence score foreach assignment of one or more characters to a first clip image. Thesecond OCR engine is operable to process the document image to generatesecond OCR output which includes second bounding boxes identifyingsecond clip images located in the document image and respective one ormore characters assigned to each second clip image. The second post-OCRengine is operable to apply shape clustering to the second OCR output toproduce second clusters with second clip images and a respectiveconfidence score for each assignment of one or more characters to asecond clip image. The vote processing engine is used to receive andprocess the first OCR output and the second OCR output and to produce afinal OCR output from the first and second clusters in based onconfidence scores.

In another aspect, a method can include processing a document image witha first optical character recognition (OCR) engine to generate first OCRoutput, and processing the document image with a second OCR engine togenerate second OCR output. The first OCR output includes first boundingboxes identifying first clip images located in the document image and arespective one or more characters assigned to each first clip image. Thesecond OCR output includes second bounding boxes identifying second clipimages located in the document image and a respective one or morecharacters assigned to each second clip image. This method furtherincludes classifying the first clip images and the second clip imagesinto clusters where each cluster includes only clip images having thesame one or more characters assigned to the clip image; generating acluster image for each cluster; using the cluster images to verify orcorrect the assignment of characters to clip images and determine aconfidence score for each assignment of one or more characters to a clipimage; and using the assignments of characters to the cluster images togenerate a final OCR output.

In another aspect, a system for optical character recognition (OCR) caninclude a first OCR engine, a second OCR engine, a post-OCR engine and avote processing engine. The first OCR engine is operable to process adocument image to generate first OCR output. This first OCR outputincludes first bounding boxes identifying first clip images located inthe document image and a respective one or more characters assigned toeach first clip image. The second OCR engine is operable to process thedocument image to generate second OCR output. This second OCR outputincludes second bounding boxes identifying second clip images located inthe document image and a respective one or more characters assigned toeach second clip image. The post-OCR engine is used to receive the firstand second OCR outputs and to classify the first clip images and thesecond clip images into clusters. Each cluster includes only clip imageshaving the same one or more characters assigned to the clip image and acluster image representing clip images for each cluster. The voteprocessing engine is operable to generate a final OCR output based onassignments of characters to the cluster images from the post-OCRengine.

In another aspect, a method can include processing a document image witha first optical character recognition (OCR) engine to generate first OCRoutput; applying shape clustering to the first OCR output to produce afirst modified OCR output. The first OCR output includes bounding boxesidentifying clip images located in the document image and a characterassignment assigning one or more characters to each clip image. Thefirst modified OCR output includes a modification of the assignment ofcharacters to clip images and words recognized in the document image.This method further includes identifying a suspect word in the firstmodified OCR output, the suspect word being a word having a characteridentified as a suspect character; and processing the suspect word witha second OCR engine to recognize the suspect word.

In another aspect, a system for optical character recognition (OCR) caninclude a first OCR engine, a first post-OCR engine and a second OCRengine. The first OCR engine is operable to process a document image togenerate first OCR output which includes bounding boxes identifying clipimages located in the document image and a character assignmentassigning one or more characters to each clip image. The first post-OCRengine is operable to apply shape clustering to the first OCR output toproduce a first modified OCR output which includes a modification of theassignment of characters to clip images and words recognized in thedocument image. The first post-OCR engine is operable to identify asuspect word in the first modified OCR output and the suspect word is aword having a character identified as a suspect character. The secondOCR engine is operable to receive and process the suspect word torecognize the suspect word.

In another aspect, a method can include processing an image of adocument to produce a collection of non-overlapping sub regions of theimage where each sub region is at a first resolution; generatingmultiple clusters of visually similar clip sub regions where each of thesub regions in the collection is included in one of the clusters;generating a representative cluster image for each of the multipleclusters from the sub regions in the respective cluster at a secondresolution higher than the first resolution; and producing a replicaimage of the document by replacing sub regions in the image with therepresentative cluster images for the clusters in which the respectivesub regions are included.

In another aspect, a method can include applying an optical characterrecognition (OCR) process to an original image of a document to produceclip images at different locations of the original image, where eachclip image is at a first resolution; classifying the clip images intoclusters of clip images, where each cluster includes clip images thatare assigned the same one or more characters codes by the OCR processand are identical or similar in size; transforming each clip image ineach cluster into a transformed clip image at a second resolution higherthan the first resolution; averaging transformed clip images in eachcluster to generate a cluster image; and using cluster images of theclusters to replace corresponding clip images initially produced by theOCR process to generate a replica of the original image of the documentat the second resolution.

In yet another aspect, a system can include an optical characterrecognition (OCR) engine and a post-OCR engine. The OCR engine isoperable to process an original image of a document to produce an OCRoutput which includes clip images at different locations of the originalimage. Each clip image is at a first resolution. The post-OCR engine isin communication with the OCR engine to receive the OCR output. Thepost-OCR engine is operable to classify the clip images into clusters ofclip images where each cluster includes clip images that are assignedthe same one or more characters codes by the OCR engine and areidentical or similar in size. The post-OCR engine is operable totransform each clip image in each cluster into a transformed clip imageat a second resolution higher than the first resolution; averagetransformed clip images in each cluster to generate a cluster image; anduse cluster images of the clusters to replace corresponding clip imagesinitially produced by the OCR engine to generate a replica of theoriginal image of the document at the second resolution.

Particular embodiments of the invention can be implemented to realizeone or more of advantages. For example, large samples from voluminousdocuments that are printed or written in common styles include imageinformation that is accessible when the number of the samples issufficiently large. Such information can be used to provide enhancedaccuracy in identifying characters. Shape clustering techniquesdescribed in this specification can be applied to process large samplesto extract additional image information on pattern similarity anddissimilarity.

The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth inthe accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features,aspects, and advantages of the invention will become apparent from thedescription, the drawings, and the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates an example of OCR-generated bounding boxes,associated clip images and assigned OCR character codes that areobtained an output from a particular OCR engine.

FIG. 2 shows an example method applying shape clustering in post-OCRprocessing.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing an example post-OCR processing enginethat applies shape clustering to the OCR output to produce a modifiedOCR output.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example process for clusterclassification by the cluster generation engine in FIG. 3.

FIG. 5 illustrates one exemplary process for computing the cluster imageby averaging clip images in a cluster aligned at their centroids.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example of a method that can be performed by thecluster processing software 330 to use the shape clustering for OCRcharacter code assignment.

FIGS. 7, 8 and 9 show examples of clusters obtained from the output ofan OCR engine and associated cluster parameters computed by the clusterprocessing engine in FIG. 3.

FIG. 10 shows an example of a sliding window process where a suspectcluster image is re-segmented into smaller cluster images by using acluster with a high confidence score as a cluster image template forre-segmenting the suspect cluster image.

FIGS. 11A and 11B show operation details of the sliding window processin FIG. 10.

FIG. 12 illustrates one implementation of automated manual correctionwhere a manual correction process can be included as part of the clusterprocessing software in FIG. 3.

FIG. 13 shows an example OCR system that includes two or more OCRengines and post-OCR processing engines in a voting configuration.

FIG. 14 shows another example OCR system that includes two or moremultiple OCR engines and a single post-OCR processing engine in a votingconfiguration.

FIG. 15 shows an example OCR system that uses a first OCR engine toprocess the original document image and a first post-OCR processingengine to process the OCR output from the first OCR engine to produce amodified OCR output.

FIG. 16 illustrates one example process to produce a high-resolutionversion of a document.

FIG. 17 illustrates an example high-resolution print-on-demand system.

FIG. 18 shows an example computer system that implements OCR andpost-OCR processing.

FIG. 19 shows an example computer system that provides an on-line OCRservice based on OCR and post-OCR processing.

Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicatelike elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The OCR outputs of different OCR engines can may vary but many includecharacter bounding boxes and OCR-assigned character codes for thebounding boxes. FIG. 1 illustrates an example of OCR-generated boundingboxes, associated clip images and assigned OCR character codes that areobtained from an output of a particular OCR engine. The OCR engineprocesses the original digital image of the document and segments theoriginal image into separated clip image corresponding to separatedrecognized characters. The OCR engine produces and uses a bounding boxto enclose and to identify one or more separately recognized characters.For example, bounding boxes 110, 120, 140 and 160 in FIG. 1 enclose thepunctuation mark period, the letter “F,” the letter “o,” and the number“4,” respectively. Each OCR character code can represent one or morecharacters. Each character can include one or more language tokens wherea language token is a fundamental unit of a language and can include,for example, a letter, a numeral, and a symbol or mark. A symbol or markcan be, for example, a punctuation mark, a typographical mark or adiacritical mark. Hence, examples of a character can be a letter, anumeral, a symbol or mark, and a ligature of two or more languagetokens. FIG. 1 includes specific examples of OCR characters generatedfrom corresponding assigned OCR character codes for letters, numbers andpunctuation marks. The text characters 130 and 150 are generated fromOCR character codes assigned by the OCR engine to the portion of thedocument image contained within the bounding box 120 for letter “F” andthe bounding box 160 for number “4,” respectively.

In the example illustrated in FIG. 1, the OCR-engine-generated boundingboxes are rectangular and vary in their sizes and aspect ratios with thesizes and aspect ratios of the enclosed separated characters. In thisexample, each bounding box encloses the image pixels of one character.

The original images of the document to be processed may be one or moreof binary images, gray scale images or colored images. Gray scale dataor color data generally contains more detailed image information thanbinary data and thus is valuable to extraction of subtle or detailedimage features. In some OCR engines, the original image is firsttransformed into a binary image and the transformed binary image is thenprocessed for optical character recognition. This conversion canadversely affect the quality of the OCR processing and the post-OCRprocessing. Some of the techniques described below, therefore, accessthe original image to obtain the gray scale or color information for usein the post OCR processing and thus improve the accuracy of theprocessing.

The techniques described in this specification can be used to exploitimage information embedded in large samples from voluminous documentsthat are printed or written in common styles to provide enhancedaccuracy in identifying characters. Shape clustering techniques areapplied to process the large samples to extract additional imageinformation on pattern similarity and dissimilarity. Examples ofvoluminous documents that are suitable for applying the shape clusteringtechniques include, among others, books, collections of printed periodicpublications such as newspapers, journals and magazines, and collectionsof handwritten documents by the same person or different people who havesimilar handwriting styles.

FIG. 2 shows an example method applying shape clustering in post-OCRprocessing. Original digital images of a document are first processed byan OCR engine to produce an OCR output that includes separated boundingboxes surrounding clip images within the original digital images. TheOCR engine also assigns OCR character codes to the bounding boxes,respectively. The post-OCR processing of this OCR output can be carriedout as follows. The clip images defined by bounding boxes in the OCRoutput are classified into different clusters of clip images at step210. The clip images classified in one cluster have been assigned one ormore common OCR character codes and recognized as identical or similarsizes by the OCR engine and are determined by the post-OCR processing tohave identical or similar shapes based on a suitable shape metric suchas a shape distance. As an example, such a cluster can include identicalor similar clip images for a letter “C” at or near a particular clipimage size. Hence, the above classification process uses the suitableshape metric to compare shapes of different clip images assigned withone or more common OCR character codes and of identical or similarsizes. A shape distance between two of such clip images, for example,can be computed to determine the degree of shape similarity. This shapecomparison separates the clip images into clusters where each clusterhas clip images of identical or similar shape measured by the shapemetric, of identical or similar sizes measured by sizes of respectivebounding boxes (e.g., the number of pixels along one dimension of abounding box), and assigned with one or more common OCR character codes.A cluster image can be generated to represent the clip images in eachcluster (step 220). The cluster image can be a representative image ofthe clip images of each cluster and can be generated with differentmethods. For example, the clip images in a cluster can be averaged toproduce an average image as the cluster image. For another example, oneof the clip images in a cluster can be selected as the cluster image.After a cluster image is generated for each cluster, each cluster can berepresented in various post-OCR processing operations by the clusterimage and the one or more OCR character codes assigned to the cluster.

Notably, after the clusters are formed, some subsequent processingoperations can be conducted at the cluster level. Each cluster image iscompared with other cluster images based on shape similarity to verifyassignment of one or more OCR character codes to a cluster and detecterroneously assigned one or more OCR character codes to a cluster in theOCR output (step 230). If no error is detected in comparing differentcluster images, the one or more OCR character codes assigned to acluster by the OCR engine is verified to be correct. If an error isdetected, one or more new OCR character codes are generated and assignedto the cluster (step 240). This process of examining the assignment ofthe one or more OCR character codes in each cluster based on shapesimilarity between different clusters and correcting an erroneousassignment can be used in part to determine a confidence score for eachassignment to a cluster image that indicates a level of reliability ofeach assignment. After the one or more new OCR character codes aregenerated, the one or more new OCR character codes are used to replacethe erroneously assigned one or more OCR character codes at eachoccurrence of the clip images of the cluster in the OCR output toproduce a modified OCR output (step 250). This correction of the OCRerror is performed at the cluster level and is applied to all images inthat cluster. This cluster-level processing can be more efficient thantechniques that perform error correction one image instance orappearance in the original document at a time. For at least this reason,this cluster-level processing can be advantageous in efficientlyprocessing voluminous documents in OCR processing.

When the comparison of cluster images based on shape similarity does notfind an error in an assignment of one or more OCR character codes to acluster by the OCR engine, the comparison has verified the assignment bythe OCR engine. This verification can be valuable because, after theverification, the level of confidence of the assignment of one or moreOCR character codes to the cluster can be raised. Hence, even through nocorrection has been made to the assignment of one or more OCR charactercodes initially generated by the OCR engine, the comparison of clusterimages can improve the OCR quality in the post-OCR processing. Aconfidence score may also be affected by other factors, e.g., whether ornot an assignment of one or more OCR character codes to a cluster isverified by manual identification and the number of clip images in acluster. For purposes of this specification, manual means requiringeffort of an independent entity such as a human being. A verification bymanual identification can be used to assign a high confidence score tothe cluster. Statistically, a large number of clip images in a clustersuggests a high confidence level for the cluster in comparison with acluster with a smaller number of clip images.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing an example post-OCR processing engine310 that applies shape clustering to the OCR output to produce amodified OCR output. The OCR engine 300 is an OCR software module thatprocesses the digital images of a document 301 and produces an OCRoutput 302. The post-OCR processing engine 310 is a software module thatfurther processes the OCR output 302 to correct any OCR errors and thusproduces a modified OCR output with improved OCR accuracy. In thisexample, the post-OCR processing engine 310 includes cluster generationsoftware 320, cluster processing software 330 and output processingsoftware 340. The cluster generation software 320 is operable to receivethe OCR output 302 and to classify the separated clip images in the OCRoutput 302 into clusters 322 based on shape similarity of the clipimages. The cluster processing software 330 processes the clusters 322and can characterize or modify the clusters 322 to produce modifiedclusters 332 in which some clusters are further characterized s and someof the OCR errors in the OCR output 302 are corrected based onproperties obtained from the clustering processing. The clusterprocessing software 330 can apply shape clustering to extract shapeinformation from the clip images in each cluster. The extracted shapeinformation can be used to compare shapes of cluster images fordifferent clusters and to obtain shape differences of differentclusters, especially the shape differences between clusters withdifferent assigned OCR character codes. This shape comparison can thenbe used to determine whether there is an error in the assigned OCRcharacter codes in the OCR output 302. The output processing software340 can apply the modified clusters 332 to the OCR output 302 and tocorrect a detected error in the OCR output 302 in generating themodified OCR output 350. An error can be an incorrect assignment of oneor more OCR character codes for a cluster. The output processingsoftware 330 may also use the cluster information in the modifiedclusters 332 to correct an incorrect segmentation of a clip image in aword. Incorrect segmentation of a clip image is discussed below, e.g.,with reference to FIGS. 10, 11A, and 11B.

The post-OCR system shown in FIG. 3 and its variations can beimplemented in one or more computer servers in a communication network.The one or more computer servers can be used to provide the OCR engine300 and the post-OCR engine 310. A client computer in the network cansend the document image 301 to the one or more computer servers torequest for an OCR output of the document 301. The OCR engine 300 andthe post-OCR engine 310 process the client's document image and producethe OCR output 350 which can be sent to the client computer through thecommunication network.

As illustrated in FIG. 3, in some implementations, the clustergeneration software 320 can directly access the original images of thedocument and retrieve gray scale or color data of the original images ofthe document that may not be available in the OCR output 302 to generatethe clusters 322. Therefore, in this example, the gray scale or colordata of the original images is used to verify and modify OCR charactercode assignment to clusters and to improve the processing accuracy inthe post-OCR processing engine 310.

In other implementations, the cluster processing software 330 may selecta cluster with questionable assigned one or more OCR character codes andobtain manual identification of the image for the selected cluster. Thismanual identification generates manual assignment of one or morecharacters with the image for the selected cluster. This specificationdescribes below ways in which some implementations determine thatassigned one or more OCR character codes are questionable.

An output of the cluster processing software 330 is modified clusters332. The output processing software 340 uses the OCR character codes forthe modified clusters 332 to update the OCR character codes in the OCRoutput 320 to produce the modified OCR output 350. Like the processingin the cluster processing software 330, the output processing software340 operates at the cluster level in updating the OCR character codes inthe OCR output 320. The output processing software 340 may also select aword including a suspect cluster with a questionable assignment of oneor more OCR character codes for re-segmenting, i.e., re-segmenting theassociated cluster image into two or more new cluster images andassigning OCR character codes to the new cluster images based on matchedimages from selected clusters with high confidence scores, such asclusters with a large number of clip images, clusters with charactercodes obtained via manual identification.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example process for cluster generationthat can be performed by the cluster generation software 320 in FIG. 3.In this process, the cluster generation software 320 uses information inthe OCR output 302 on shapes and sizes of clip images in addition to theOCR character codes assigned by the OCR engine 300 to classify the clipimages into clusters, buckets and classes. The clip images classified inone cluster have been assigned one or more common OCR character codes bythe OCR engine 300 and were recognized by the OCR engine 300 toapproximately be of a particular clip image size based on the sizes ofrespective bounding boxes. In particular, in this process, clips imagesin one cluster are selected based on a shape metric to be identical orsimilar in shape with one another. In some implementations, the fonttype information is not explicitly used in generating the clusters bythe cluster generation software 320. The shape comparing process used ingenerating the clusters, however, tend to place clip images for acharacter of identical or similar fonts and in identical or similar fontsizes into the same cluster. For example, clip images for the letter “g”in the Time Roman font and of the 12-point font size may be classifiedin one cluster while clip images for the letter “g” in the Time Romanfont and of the 10-point font size are in a different cluster. Clusterscan be grouped into buckets where each bucket has clusters that areassigned one or more common OCR character codes in identical and similarsizes. All buckets that are assigned with the one or more common OCRcharacter codes can be grouped together as a class of clustersidentified by the common one or more OCR character codes. For example,all clusters of clip images for the letter “c” in different fonts andfont sizes are in the “c” class. Hence, the clip images for thetwenty-six alphabetic letters in English are classified in twenty-sixdifferent classes.

In the example cluster generation in FIG. 4, the cluster generationsoftware 320 first divides clip images into classes where clip images inone class are assigned one or more common OCR character codes regardlesstheir shapes and sizes (step 410). In each class, the cluster generationsoftware 320 divides clip images into buckets where clip images in onebucket have identical or similar sizes but can be different shapes suchas different font types (step 420). This is done in all classes. In eachbucket, the cluster generation software 320 divides clip images intoclusters where clip images in one cluster have identical or similarshapes based on their shape distances from one another, e.g., charactersidentical or similar in font types and sizes (step 430).

After the classification of the clip images into clusters, the clustergeneration software 320 generates a cluster image for each cluster thatrepresents the shape of the cluster. The cluster image is arepresentative image of the clip images in the cluster and can begenerated by, e.g., averaging clip images in each cluster or selecting aparticular clip image from the clip images (step 440). As a result, eachcluster can be represented by the cluster image and the respective oneor more OCR character codes assigned to the cluster (step 450). In thesubsequent processing by the post-OCR engine 310, various post-OCRprocessing operations can be performed at the cluster level withoutprocessing individual clip images. A number of averaging techniques canbe applied to obtain the cluster image. FIG. 5 illustrates one exampleprocess for computing the cluster image by averaging clip images alignedat their centroids. The image information within the bounding box foreach clip image can be used to compute a centroid of each clip image(step 510). Bounding boxes for different clip images within a clusterare aligned with respect to their computed centroids (step 520). Thepixel values of the aligned clip images for the cluster are averaged togenerate the averaged image as the cluster image (step 530). Each pixelvalue can be a binary value, a gray scale value or a color valuedepending what pixel values for the clip images were initially used incomparing shapes of different clip images by the cluster generationsoftware 320 during cluster generation. The gray scale or color valuesfor the pixels of the clip images can be used to generate the clustersand to compute a cluster image with detailed and subtle features thatmay not be available from the cluster image obtained from binary pixelvalues. When the OCR engine 300 provides only binary image informationin the OCR output 302, the post-processing engine 310 can directlyaccess the original images of the document 301 to obtain the gray scaleor color information. The position coordinates of the bounding box foreach separated clip image in the OCR output 302 are known and thebounding box can be applied to the original images of the document 301based on the known position coordinates to obtain the corresponding grayscale or color pixel information from the original images of thedocument 301. The obtained gray scale or color information for each clipimage is then used to compare the shapes of clip images for generatingthe clusters 320 and to compute the averaged images of clip imageswithin each cluster as the corresponding cluster image.

As described above, a clip image as a basic unit of a cluster can be animage that represents one or more OCR character codes. Therefore, two ormore OCR character codes can be assigned to a single clip image. ManyOCR engines are designed to use a single bounding box as a basic unit toassign one or more OCR character codes to the clip image associated witheach single bounding box. In implementing clustering techniques in thisspecification, a basic unit for a cluster can be a clip image associatedwith a single bounding box produced by the OCR engine, and a clip imageassociated with two or more adjacent bounding boxes produced by the OCRengine. In the latter case, the joint clip image is a “joint” clip imagewhich is a combination of two or more clip images respectivelyassociated with two or more adjacent bounding boxes in the received OCRoutput. Accordingly, the cluster generation software 320 can be designedto classify joint clip images in the received OCR output into jointclusters of joint clip images that are identical or similar in shape andsize and are associated with the same characters assigned by the OCRengine to the respective adjacent bounding boxes. When a joint clipimage associated with two or more adjacent bounding boxes produced bythe OCR engine is used as the basic unit for forming a cluster, thecluster generation software 320 in FIG. 3 essentially treats therespective two or more adjacent bounding boxes as a joint singlebounding box in determining the size of the clip image. Such a jointbounding box is not produced by the OCR engine and is a product of andgenerated by the cluster generation software 320 in the present post-OCRprocessing engine 310.

In various processing operations described in this specification, theuse or treatment of such a joint bounding box having two or moreadjacent OCR-generated bounding boxes can be identical or similar to theuse or treatment of a single OCR-generated bounding box, includingcomputation of shape distances of clip images associated with boundingboxes, centroids of bounding boxes, alignment of different boundingboxes, averaging clip images associated with bounding boxes, obtainingmanual identification and interpolation a clip image in a bounding box.Hence, a bounding box in this specification can be a single bounding boxgenerated by an OCR engine or a bounding box that joins two or moreadjacent bounding boxes generated by the OCR engine. Accordingly, ajoint clip image associated with a joint bounding box that joins two ormore adjacent bounding boxes generated by the OCR engine can be acombination of individual clip images that are respectively associatedwith the two or more adjacent bounding boxes generated by the OCRengine, and can be treated in the same way as a clip image associatedwith a single bounding box generated by the OCR engine in clusterprocessing.

Notably, joint clip images associated with bounding boxes each joiningtwo or more adjacent bounding boxes generated by the OCR engine can beclustered in the clustering processing described in this specification.Hence, in comparing each cluster to all clusters of a differentcharacter, the comparison includes clusters in which each cluster memberhas a bounding box that joins two or more OCR-generated bounding boxesand thus is assigned a number of characters. As a result, the comparisonin a clustering process can yield multiple disagreements with differentclusters.

For example, a “r” cluster assigned an OCR character code for thecharacter ‘r’ includes clip image samples for the character “r.” Some ofthese clip image samples in the “r” cluster, e.g., a “r” clip image nextto a “n” clip image, may also be included in a 2-character clusterassigned an OCR character ligature of “rn” as part of clip images for“rn.” The cluster image for the “rn” cluster can be closer in shape to a“m” cluster than many other clusters, including the “r” and “n”clusters. While there may be conflicting evidence, the overall processfor determining whether each cluster is a suspect cluster, an acceptablecluster, or an island cluster remains the same. The above example of n=2extends to n-gram clusters and as n increases, the computationalrequirements increase and the accuracy return may decrease.

The cluster processing software 330 evaluates each cluster 322 todetermine whether the one or more OCR character codes originallyassigned to each cluster by the OCR engine 300 is sufficiently reliablefor use in the modified OCR output 350. When one or more OCR charactercodes originally assigned to a cluster by the OCR engine 300 aredetermined to be unreliable, the cluster processing software 330 canperform additional processing on the cluster to obtain one or more OCRcharacter codes that are more reliable to represent the cluster image.This processing modifies some of the clusters 322 to produce themodified clusters 332. The assigned OCR character codes for the modifiedclusters 322 are then used to produce the modified OCR output 350.

The level of the reliability of one or more OCR character codes assignedto a particular cluster is also referred to as a level of confidence andcan be numerically represented by a confidence score. A thresholdconfidence score may be set for the cluster processing software 330 toidentify as acceptable clusters those having confidence scores above thethreshold confidence score and as suspect clusters those havingconfidence scores below the threshold confidence score. A number offactors or parameters can be used, either individually or in certaincombinations, to decide the confidence scores. One relevant factor isthe number of clip images in a cluster. Statistically, a large number ofclip images in a cluster suggests a high confidence level for thecluster in comparison with a cluster with a smaller number of clipimages. Another relevant factor is the manner of obtaining one or moreOCR character codes for a clip image or a cluster image which canreflect the reliability of the particular one or more OCR charactercodes. For example, a cluster image can be identified manually by aperson, and the corresponding one or more OCR character codes generatedbased on the manual identification can be considered as a highlyreliable assignment and thus be assigned a high confidence score.

Examples described below provide details on how to use the number ofclip images in a cluster and the shape similarity between a cluster andother clusters to determine the confidence scores and to rank theclusters based on such scores.

The cluster processing software 330 can correlate the shape informationof different clusters generated by the cluster generation software 320to detect and correct errors in the OCR character codes assigned by theOCR engine 300 and to verify the OCR character codes assigned by the OCRengine 300. During this process, the software 330 can modify some of theclusters by correcting errors in the OCR output 302 to produce modifiedclusters 332, more specifically, to produce an association of clusterimages and character codes by verifying (and correcting if necessary)the character code assignments for each cluster image. In someimplementations, the cluster processing software 330 applies a shapemetric to compute a shape distance as a measure of the shape differencebetween the cluster images of two clusters and as one factor todetermine the confidence score of a cluster. This use of a shape metricfor comparing shapes can also be used in comparing clip images when theclusters 320 are first generated by the cluster generation software 320.Hence, the example techniques below for computing the shape distancesbetween two cluster images in the cluster processing software 330 can beused to compute shape distances between to clip images in the clustergeneration software 320.

A number of shape metrics may be used in the cluster processing software330. For example, for binary images, various shape distances based onthe Hausdorff distance can be used. Similar to obtaining the clusterimages in the cluster generation software 320, greater accuracy in shapecomparison can be achieved by using the color or grayscalerepresentation of the pixel values for the clip images in computingshape distances. When the OCR output 302 provides only binary imageinformation for the clip images, the color or grayscale information canbe directly obtained by the post-OCR engine 310 from the original image301 of the document processed by the OCR engine 300. When the clustergeneration software 320 has already obtained the color or grayscaleinformation from the original image 301 in computing the cluster imagesfor the clusters 322, the cluster processing software 330 can use thesame color or grayscale information to compute the shape distances.Otherwise, the cluster processing software 330 can access the originalimage 301 for the color or gray scale information.

To determine the shape distance between two cluster images I and J, thecluster images I and J are aligned based on their centroids of thebounding boxes. In some implementations, the shape distance betweenaligned cluster images I and J can be computed as follows:

$\sqrt[n]{\sum\limits_{P}\left\lbrack {{I(P)} - {J(P)}} \right\rbrack^{n}}$where n is a positive integer greater than 1, I(P) and J(P) are grayscale or color pixel values of the two cluster images I and J at a pixellocation P common to both images upon alignment of their bounding boxesand where the sum is made over all pixel positions.

The cluster processing software 330 can use the above or other shapemetric to evaluate the confidence level of the one or more OCR charactercodes assigned to each cluster based on the shape distances between thecluster and other clusters. For example, a threshold shape distance canbe selected to identify “island” clusters that are away from the closestclusters by a shape distance greater than the threshold shape distance.When a cluster is too far away from all other clusters in all bucketsand classes, that cluster can no longer be reasonably compared withother clusters based on the shape distances alone to approve ordisapprove the level of confidence of the assigned one or more OCRcharacter codes for the cluster image, especially for clusters assigneddifferent OCR character codes. Accordingly, the cluster processingsoftware 330 may identify an island cluster as a suspect cluster whoselevel of confidence is unacceptable and is subject to further processingor verification. For example, the cluster processing software 330 mayselect an island cluster for manual identification by a person and thusconvert a suspect cluster into an acceptable cluster with a highconfidence score.

Another parameter for measuring the level of confidence of a cluster isthe number of clip images in the cluster. That a cluster has a largenumber of clip images directly suggests a high level of confidence forthe cluster. For this reason, the cluster processing software 330 canuse a threshold value for the number of clip images in the cluster toevaluate clusters. When the number of clip images in a cluster is lessthan the threshold value, the cluster is labeled as a suspect clusterand is subject to further processing and verification. Oneimplementation of the further processing and verification in the clusterprocessing software 330 is manual identification by a person. The resultof the manual identification can be used to convert a suspect clusterinto an acceptable cluster with a high confidence score.

For clusters that are not suspect clusters, the cluster processingsoftware 330 can identify such clusters as acceptable clusters and usethem for producing the modified OCR output 350. The assignment of one ormore OCR character codes for a suspect cluster may be included in themodified OCR output 350 when additional processing or verification forthat suspect cluster is not available. The cluster processing software330 can temporarily include a suspect cluster in the modified OCR output350 and update the suspect cluster when additional processing orverification for that suspect cluster becomes available.

Clusters with the highest numbers of clip images in their respectiveclasses can be identified as master clusters because such a mastercluster tends to be more likely to be an acceptable cluster than anon-master cluster in the same class. However, a master cluster may be asuspect cluster under various circumstances. For example, a mastercluster can be an island cluster or can have a number of clip imagesless than the threshold value set in the cluster processing software330.

The cluster processing software 330 can apply the threshold shapedistance and the threshold value for the number of clip images in acluster to rank and process the clusters 322 output by the clustergeneration software 320. In one implementation, all clusters in allclasses are ranked in a descending order based on the numbers of clipimages or instances in the clusters and process one cluster at a time inthis order. For each cluster C, if the cluster C is a master cluster inits class, the cluster processing software 330 can skip the processingand proceed to process the next smaller cluster. In someimplementations, if the cluster C is not a master cluster, the clusterprocessing software 330 determines the distance of the cluster C to thenearest cluster C′ in terms of a shape metric, e.g., a shape distance.The cluster C′ is a cluster that is larger than the cluster C and is notflagged as suspect. The cluster C′ may be a master cluster, or a clusterprocessed before the cluster C is processed in the sequence definedabove. If the cluster C′ is found to have a different associated OCRcharacter code than that of the cluster C, the cluster processingsoftware 330 determines that the OCR engine 300 has made an error in theassignment to the cluster C. Accordingly, the cluster processingsoftware 330 can change the OCR character code assigned to the cluster Cand assign a different OCR character code associated with the cluster C′to the cluster C. If the cluster C′ is found to have the same associatedOCR character code as that of the cluster C, the cluster processingsoftware 330 determines that the OCR engine 300 has made an correctassignment to the cluster C. The above process can be iterated by thecluster processing software 330 to deal with cases where the nearestcluster C′ to the currently considered cluster C is flagged as a suspectcluster. When this occurs, the cluster processing software 330 continuesto process other clusters to search for a non-suspect C′ until nocluster C has a suspect C′ in the same class.

The cluster processing software 330 can execute the above process todetect OCR errors and correct some of the errors by changing the OCRcharacter codes assigned to some clusters. This process produces themodified clusters 332 with improved accuracy in assignment of the OCRcharacter codes. The output processing software 340 can apply themodified clusters 332 to the OCR output 302 to produce the modified OCRoutput 350 with reduced errors.

The cluster processing software 330 can also be programmed to apply aselected shape metric to compute the shape distance between the averagedimages of two clusters for all clusters in the entire document and thenclassifies the clusters into master clusters, acceptable clusters,suspect clusters, and island clusters based on the shape distances andthe number of images in each cluster. These different categories ofclusters can be further processed by comparing with one another tochange some of the suspect clusters into acceptable clusters.

FIG. 6 illustrates an example process performed by the clusterprocessing software 330 to use the shape clustering for OCR charactercode assignment. In this example, the cluster processing software 330evaluates the confidence level of the initial OCR character codeassigned to a cluster and, if appropriate, replaces the initial one ormorocco character codes assigned to the cluster with different one ormore OCR character codes for another cluster that has the shortest shapedistance to, the cluster under processing. The cluster processingsoftware 330 evaluates and processes all clusters to produce a modifiedcollection of clusters 332 for the document 301 with reduced OCR errorsthat are present in the original OCR output document 302. Morespecifically, the shape distances between cluster images of a particularcluster and all other clusters, regardless of class, are computed (Step610). A cluster that has a shape distance from a nearest cluster in allclasses is greater than a threshold distance is labeled as an “island”cluster without changing respective one or more OCR character codes forthe cluster (Step 620). This process classifies the clusters as islandclusters and non-island clusters. For each island cluster, the clusterprocessing software 330 labels such a cluster as a suspect cluster andinvokes a different processing mechanism to process the cluster, e.g.,using manual identification or re-segmenting each word that contains aclip image in this suspect cluster. For each non-island cluster, theassociated nearest cluster in the same class and the associated nearestcluster from a different class can be identified and each of suchnearest clusters has more sample clip images than the current non-islandcluster under processing (Step 630). Next, the cluster processingsoftware 330 determines whether the nearest cluster between the abovetwo selected clusters is an acceptable cluster, i.e., being sufficientlyreliable for use in the modified OCR out 350 (Step 640). As described inearlier sections of this specification, whether a cluster is acceptablecan be determined by, e.g., a confidence score assigned to the cluster.

If the nearest cluster is an acceptable cluster and is in a differentclass from the non-island cluster under processing, the one or more OCRcharacter codes of the current non-island cluster under processing arereplaced with the one or more OCR character codes associated with thenearest cluster as the new one or more OCR character codes for thecurrent cluster (Steps 650 and 670). If the nearest cluster is anacceptable cluster and is in the same class from the non-island clusterunder processing, the one or more OCR character codes of the currentcluster are verified as being correct and thus are maintained withoutchange for use in the modified OCR output 350 (steps 650 and 680).

On the other hand, if the nearest cluster is not an acceptable cluster,the cluster processing software 330 determines whether to continue tosearch for an acceptable cluster that is nearest to the currentnon-island cluster under processing (step 660). If yes, the above searchprocess is iterated; otherwise, the one or more OCR character codes ofthe current cluster under processing are maintained and labeled asacceptable for use in the modified OCR output 350 (Step 680). In thelatter case, the shape comparison does not confirm or reject theoriginal OCR assignment.

FIGS. 7, 8 and 9 show examples of clusters obtained from the output ofan OCR engine and results of post-OCR processing of the clusters.Cluster parameters computed by the cluster processing software 330 asdescribed above are labeled. In FIG. 7, the top row 710 represents “C”cluster images formed from one size as classified by the OCR engine.These clusters are slightly different in shape and size and also includesix “G” clusters in the central region of the top row 710 that areincorrectly classified as “C” clusters by the OCR engine. The middle row720 shows the corresponding closest matches of all “C” clusters in the“C” class. Note that the middle row includes two “G” clusters that areincorrectly classified by the OCR engine as the “C” clusters. The bottomrow 730 has the corresponding closest matches of all clusters that arenot in the “C” class. The label in the upper-left corner of each clusterimage in the bottom row 730 shows the OCR character of the OCR charactercode assigned to the cluster. In the middle row, three numbers 701, 702and 703 are cluster parameters that characterize the cluster in thesecond row 720. The top number 701 is the number of samples in each ofthe top row of clusters, the second number 702 is the shape distancebetween the top “C” cluster and the middle other “C” cluster, and thebottom number 703 is the shape distance between the top “C” cluster andthe bottom nearest non-“C” cluster. For example, the top-right C clusterin FIG. 7 has 1899 samples. If the middle number is less than the lowernumber, the corresponding top cluster is likely to be correctlyclassified by the OCR engine as a “C” cluster; otherwise, the OCR enginelikely made an error as indicated by red colored examples for themisclassified “G” clusters in the top row. In FIG. 7, the total numberof samples for the incorrectly labeled clusters is (1+30+9+1+2+7)=50 andthus 50 errors can be corrected automatically by the cluster-levelprocessing.

FIG. 7 further shows the level of confidence for the OCR assignments forthe clusters based on the shape clustering processing. The clusteringprocessing software 330 uses a labeling parameter to label whether acluster is acceptable, verified with a high confidence score, or suspector rejected with a wrong OCR assignment. FIG. 7 graphically representsthis labeling parameter by using a mark in the lower right corer of eachcluster image. This mark in the lower right corner of each cluster imageis used here to ad the understanding the characterization and labelingof a cluster and may not be used by the post-OCR processing software.The lower right corner of a cluster image is not marked if the clusteris acceptable but is not verified to have a high confidence score viamanual identification or other means. The lower right corner of acluster image is marked with a check sign if the cluster is acceptableand is verified to have a high confidence score via manualidentification or other means. The lower right corner of a cluster imageis marked with a cross sign if the cluster is unacceptable and isverified to be wrong. The incorrectly labeled clusters are marked with across sign in their lower right corner, such as the six “G” clusters inthe central region of the top row 710 which were incorrectly assigned as“C” by the OCR engine. FIG. 8 shows examples of clusters that are allinitially recognized as “B” by an OCR engine. As illustrated in FIG. 8,a cluster analysis by the cluster processing software 330 correctlyfinds that the distance to the nearest non “B” cluster, in this case and“R” cluster, is less than the distance to the closest “B” cluster andthus that 10 out of 14 clusters are actually “R” clusters. As indicatedby the cross sign in the lower right corner, the first cluster for theletter “R” on the left end of the top row in FIG. 8 is incorrectlyassigned as a “B” cluster by the OCR engine.

FIG. 9 shows an example of an “island” cluster where 38 examples of theclip image for the sequence “fri” are, incorrectly, identified as “M” byan OCR engine. If manual identification is used to correct this OCRerror and to assign the proper ligature “fri” to the island cluster, theisland cluster can be re-classified into an acceptable cluster with ahigh confidence score. After this re-classification, a singlecluster-level correction based on the newly assigned character “fri” canbe used to correct all 38 errors in the document.

The example in FIG. 9 suggests that an OCR engine may incorrectlysegment a group of different characters into a single clip image (e.g.,“fri”) and hence treat the group as a single character (e.g., “M”). Acluster with such a segmentation error tends to be larger measured bythe size of its bounding box than typical clusters of single characters.Manual identification by a person can be used to correct such an error.The cluster processing software 330 can be used to automatically selecta suspect cluster for manual identification and use the result of themanual identification to update assignment of the one or more OCRcharacter codes for the cluster, thus transforming the suspect clusterinto an acceptable cluster

Alternatively, the post-OCR engine 310 in FIG. 3 can re-segment such alarge suspect cluster image into two or more smaller cluster images bysearching a match with cluster images of acceptable clusters with highconfidence scores obtained by shape clustering including manualidentification. In this process, an acceptable cluster with a highconfidence score is selected from a pool of acceptable clusters withhigh confidence scores in the modified clusters 332 and is used as acluster image template. The cluster image template and the suspectcluster are compared by spatially sliding the template through thesuspect cluster image, one pixel at a time, to compare the shapesimilarity between the cluster image template and each subsection of thesuspect cluster. This matching process is repeated with all acceptableclusters in the pool to identify all matches. The two or more smallercluster images produced in this matching process correspond to two ormore new clusters and the new clusters are then processed.

This use of a pool of acceptable clusters with high confidence scores ascluster image templates can process a suspect word in the OCR output 302after the cluster shaping. In one implementation, the output processingsoftware 340 can be programmed to run each of the cluster imagetemplates through the suspect word to identify any matches. When thereis at least one match, the image of the suspect word, which wassegmented by the OCR engine into clip images in different adjacentbounding boxes in the OCR output 302, is re-segmented into new clipimages in different adjacent new bounding boxes. Each new bounding boxcan be, for example, a clip image of a single character or a ligature.

FIG. 10 shows an example of a sliding window process 1010 where the clipimage 1001 of a suspect word is re-segmented into smaller images 1002 ofcharacters or ligatures by using a pool of selected clusters with highconfidence scores in the modified clusters 322 as cluster imagetemplates. This pool of selected clusters can include, for example,clusters that are obtained via manual identification, clusters that havelarge numbers of sample clip images, clusters that have been verified tobe correct by shape clustering. The sliding window process 1010 compareseach of the selected clusters with subsections of the suspect word andthen re-segments suspect word based on the matches with the clusterimage templates. This sliding window process 1010 can be implemented bysoftware as part of the output processing software 340.

The cluster processing software 340 selects a cluster image of aselected cluster as a cluster image template. This selected cluster hasa high confidence score for the assigned one or more OCR charactercodes. The cluster processing software 340 first aligns the clusterimage template with different image portions within the clip image 1001of the suspect word along a predetermined sliding direction, one portionat a time. The predetermined sliding direction can be, for example, thehorizontal direction from the left to the right. Hence, the clusterimage template is aligned with different portions within the suspectword. Shape metric distances between the cluster image template and thedifferent portions of the word image are obtained, respectively. Theobtained shape metric distances are used to determine whether a portionof the word image matches the cluster image template. A matching portionof the word image that matches the cluster image template is separatedfrom on or more other portions of the word image. The one or more OCRcharacter codes assigned to the selected cluster are assigned to theseparated matching portion of the word image in the modified OCR output.

FIGS. 11A and 11B show operation details of the sliding window process1010 in FIG. 10. FIG. 11A shows the sliding window process 1010 using acluster image template 1100 selected from a cluster image with a highconfidence score to align with different portions of the suspect wordimage 1001. For example, the cluster image template 1100 is placed at aseries of different positions that are shifted by one pixel between twoadjacent positions along the sliding direction to overlap with thesuspect word image 1001. FIG. 11B shows an example processing operation.First, the cluster image template 1100 is selected from the availablecluster images with high confidence scores (Step 1110). The centroid ofthe cluster image template 1100 and that of the beginning portion of thesuspect word image 1001 are aligned (Step 1120). The shape distancebetween the cluster image template 1100 and the overlapped beginningportion of the suspect word image 1001 is computed (Step 1130). Thecluster image template 1100 and the suspect word image 1001 are thenshifted relative to each other along the sliding direction by one pixelto align the cluster image template 1100 with a subsequent portion ofthe suspect word image 1001 (Step 1140) and the shape distance iscomputed again (Step 1150). This process iterates at the differentpositions so that the sliding window process 1010 computes respectiveshape metric distances between the cluster image template 1100 and thedifferent image portions of the suspect word image 1001 (Step 1160). Thecomputed shape metric distances are used to determine whether an imageportion of the suspect word image 1001 matches the cluster imagetemplate 1100. The above process is repeated for all selected clusterswith high confidence scores (step 1170).

If there is a match, a matching portion of the suspect word image 1001is separated and is assigned with the respective one or more OCRcharacter codes for the matched cluster image template. This result isused in the modified OCR output 350 produced by the output processingsoftware 340. If the one or more remaining segments of the suspect wordimage 1001 after the segmentation have matched cluster image templates,the respective OCR character codes are used in the modified OCR output350. If the one or more remaining segments of the suspect word image1001 after the segmentation do not have matched cluster image templates,these segments are marked as unidentifiable images and can be furtherprocessed by other methods (e.g., manual identification) or labeled assuch in the modified OCR output 350. If there is not a single matchafter the sliding window process, the suspect word image 1001 is markedas an unidentifiable image and can be further processed by other methods(e.g., manual identification) or labeled as such in the modified OCRoutput 350.

The sliding window process 1010 shown in FIGS. 10, 11A and 11B can alsobe implemented as part of the cluster processing software 330 tore-segment a suspect cluster image into two or more smaller segmentedcluster images. In this regard, the processing steps described in FIGS.10, 11A and 11B are applied to a cluster image of the suspect clusterinstead of the suspect word image. The segmented cluster images arefurther processed by cluster processing software 330 like other clustersin the clusters 320. The cluster processing software 330 selects a firstcluster image of a first cluster as a cluster image template. The firstcluster image has a high confidence score for the assigned one or moreOCR character codes. A second cluster image from a second cluster with alow confidence score, e.g., a suspect cluster, is selected to bere-segmented by the sliding window process 1010. The cluster processingsoftware 330 can first align the cluster image template with differentimage portions within the second cluster image along a predetermineddirection, one portion at a time. If there is a match, a matchingportion of the suspect cluster image is then used as a new third clusterimage for a third cluster to be formed. The corresponding portion ineach clip image in the suspect cluster image that corresponds to thecluster image template 1100 is separated from the clip image to form anew clip image. The new clip images respectively separated from the clipimages in the second cluster are used to form the third cluster which isassigned one or more OCR character codes which are assigned to thecluster image template 1100. The remainders of clip images of thesuspect cluster image after separation of the new clip images for thethird cluster are used to form at least one fourth cluster. If thelocation of the matched portion is in the middle of the suspect clusterimage to split the suspect cluster image into three segments, theremainders of the clip images of the suspect cluster image can form twodifferent new clusters. The newly segmented clusters are then used toreplace the second cluster in producing the modified OCR output 350.

Suspect clusters may also be processed by incorporating manualidentification and correction in an automated way at the cluster levelto exploit the high accuracy of the manual correction. The clusteringtechniques described in this specification can be implemented tomitigate the high cost and laborious process of many other manual OCRcorrection techniques.

FIG. 12 illustrates one implementation of automated manual correctionwhere a manual correction process 1210 can be included as part of thecluster processing software 330 in FIG. 3. In operation, the clusterprocessing software 330 selects a cluster image of a cluster, e.g., asuspect cluster, to solicit manual identification and uses the manualidentification to generate one or more new OCR character codes for theselected cluster.

The request for manual identification may be sent to one or more on-linemanual correction resources 1220. An on-line manual correction resource1220 can be an on-line computer through which an operator views arequested suspect cluster image and the assigned OCR character and sendsback either a confirmation of the associated text for the cluster imageor a new corrected text for the cluster image. A single request caninclude images for multiple suspect clusters. The manual correctionprocess 1210 uses the response from the on-line manual correctionresource 1220 to update the cluster in the modified clusters 332. Forexample, the manual correction process 1210 can replace the one or moreexisting OCR character codes for the suspect cluster with one or morenew OCR character codes generated based on the returned response fromthe on-line manual correction resource 1220. For each manually correctedor confirmed cluster, the cluster processing software 330 changes thecluster from a suspect cluster to an acceptable cluster and assigns ahigh confidence score to the cluster for use in subsequent post-OCRprocessing. This allows the modified clusters 332 to be updated with themanual correction result by the cluster processing software 330.

Alternatively, the automated manual correction may be implemented byusing on-line resources without designated persons or operators for themanual correction. The on-line manual correction resource may bedesigned as part of an on-line game or service where a manual input by auser is needed for the on-line game or service.

For example, the cluster image of a suspect cluster may be used as animage for an on-line game which requires a player to identify the image.The ESP game at http://www.espgame.org/ is one example for such anon-line game where a player is presented with an image and the player isrequested to enter the name of an object shown in the image. The name,e.g., the character code, entered by the player is used, on one hand, aspart of the on-line game and, on the other hand, is simultaneously usedas a manual identification of the suspect cluster image for the post-OCRprocessing.

For another example, various web sites use a challenge-response testsuch as the CAPTCHA (“Completely Automated Public Turing test to tellComputers and Humans Apart”) images as part of a log-in process todetermine whether or not the user of the web site is a human being. Theimage of a suspect cluster can be used as a CAPTCHA or a part of aCAPTCHA. Hence, a CAPTCHA with a distorted text may be attached with animage of a suspect cluster at the end. A user attempting to gain accessto the service would both solve the CAPTCHA and give the best guess asto what the one or more characters represented by the suspect clusterimage at the end of the CAPTCHA might be. The user identified charactersare received and are used to verify or correct one or more particularcharacters assigned to the suspect cluster image by the OCR process. Toimprove the accuracy of the user identification via the CAPTCHA, thesame cluster image of the suspect cluster may be sent in differentCAPTCHAs to different users to provide a redundancy check on thereturned responses for the cluster image where a consistent answer tothe same cluster image from different users is a strong indication thatreturned response is reliable. Hence, in one implementation, a useridentification of the averaged image of the particular cluster isobtained from each of multiple different users based on the on-linechallenge-response test. A particular user identification of theaveraged image of the particular cluster is validated using obtaineduser identifications from other users of the multiple different users.The validated user identification is then used to verify or correct oneor more particular characters assigned to the particular cluster by theOCR process.

A cluster image generated by an OCR engine may be a nonsensical imagethat does not represent any characters. This may be caused in differentways. For example, improper segmentation by the OCR engine can produce apart of a character in a clip image or a character in combination with apart of another character in a clip image. For another example, theoriginal document images fed into the OCR engine may have a nonsensicalmark in a clip image. When a nonsensical cluster image is classified asa suspect cluster image for manual identification in any one of theabove automated manual correction techniques, the person who views thenonsensical suspect cluster image can respond with a message statingthat the image is nonsensical or the image is not a single or more wholecharacters. The manual correction processing 1210 can be configured tohandle this situation by retaining the suspect status of such a clusterand flagging the nature of this cluster. For example, automaticre-segmentation can be applied to incorrectly segmented characters andthe results can be fed back to the manual verification process,repeatedly if necessary, until a satisfactory segmentation is obtained.

The post-OCR systems shown in FIG. 12 and its variations can beimplemented in one or more computer servers in a communication network.The one or more computer servers can be used to provide the OCR engineand the post-OCR engine. A client computer in the network can send thedocument image to the one or more computer servers to request for an OCRoutput of the document. The OCR engine and the post-OCR engine processthe client's document image and produce the OCR output which can be sentto the client computer through the communication network. One or moreon-line servers can be connected to the communication network and tosupply on-line manual correction resources for use by the post-OCRengine. The post-OCR engine is operable to select a cluster which has alow level of confidence to obtain a manual assignment of one or morecharacters with the cluster image of the selected cluster. In thisregard, a request is made to the on-line server and the on-line serverthen generates the manual assignment for the selected cluster image. Theon-line server can be, for example, a computer that supplies achallenge-response test to users at user computers accessing a web sitehosted by the on-line server, or a computer that hosts the ESP game orother games that solicit responses from on-line users.

One of the applications for the post-OCR processing techniques describedin this specification is post-OCR processing in an OCR system with twoor more OCR engines. This use of two or more OCR engines can furtherexploit benefits of redundancy in OCR processing and to improve the OCRaccuracy. Such a system can be implemented in various configurations.

FIG. 13 shows an example OCR system that includes two or more OCRengines 1301, 1302 and post-OCR processing engines 1311, 1312 connectedto operate in parallel in a voting configuration. Each OCR engine ispaired with a post-OCR processing engine. Hence, an imaged document 1300is independently processed by all the OCR engines in parallel. Each OCRoutput is then further processed by a respective post-OCR processingengine. This process produces multiple OCR outputs for the same imageddocument 1300. Each post-OCR processing engine can be designed toperform part of or the entire processing functions based on the post OCRprocessing shown in FIG. 3. A vote processing engine 1320 is provided toreceive the different OCR outputs from the post-OCR processing enginesand to further process the received the different OCR outputs to producethe final OCR output 1330. The vote processing engine 1320 can applydifferent voting methods in producing the final OCR output 1330

In one implementation, for example, each post-OCR processing engine inFIG. 13 can perform the clustering generation 320 and produce the clipimages 322 for the clusters shown in FIG. 3 without modifying thecharacter assignment made by the respective OCR engine. The voteprocessing engine 1320 can choose any one of the clusters produced bythe different post-OCR processing engines for the corresponding imagesin the final OCR output 1330. Different post-OCR processing engines canassign confidence scores to generated clusters from the post-OCRprocessing engines and the vote processing engine 1320 can use theconfidence scores to select the cluster from a post-OCR processingengine with the highest confidence score for the final OCR output 1330.As a result, the final OCR output 1330 is generated by the voteprocessing engine 1320 based on a combination of the most reliableclusters from different post-OCR processing engines and can have abetter OCR accuracy than that of an OCR output produced by a single pairof an OCR engine and a post-OCR processing engine.

In another implementation, each post-OCR processing engine in FIG. 13can be configured to modify or verify the character assignment initiallymade by the respective OCR engine. This modification can be achieved by,e.g., applying the clustering processing 330 to produce the modifiedclusters 332 in FIG. 3. Each post-OCR processing engine in FIG. 13produces a modified OCR output with improved reliability. The voteprocessing engine 1320 then uses the modified OCR outputs to produce thefinal OCR output 1330 based on the confidence scores of the clusters.

In a further implementation of the system in FIG. 13, each post-OCRprocessing engine (1311 or 1312) can be configured to classify clipimages defined by bounding boxes in a received OCR output from therespective OCR engine (1301 or 1302) into clusters of clip images. Eachcluster has clip images of similar image sizes and shapes that areassigned the same one or more particular characters by the correspondingOCR engine. Each post-OCR processing engine also produces a clusterimage for each cluster, e.g., averaging clip images in each cluster togenerate an averaged image as the cluster image. The vote processingengine 1320 can be configured to use shape differences between a clusterimage of each cluster and cluster images of other clusters to detectwhether an error exists in the one or more particular charactersassigned to each cluster by the corresponding OCR engine and to correcteach detected error in a particular cluster by newly assigning one ormore particular characters to the particular cluster. The voteprocessing engine 1320 can further operate to use the newly assigned oneor more particular characters for the particular cluster to replacerespective one or more particular characters previously assigned by thecorresponding OCR engine in a corresponding modified OCR output.

In the system in FIG. 13, two different OCR engines may segment theimage differently. The vote processing engine 1320 can select the bestclusters from the outputs of the post-OCR engines. Consider an examplewhere one OCR engine improperly segments the image of a single characterinto two separate clip images in two adjacent bounding boxes while otherOCR engines correctly identify the same image of the single character asa single clip image and place it in one bounding box. The voteprocessing engine 1320 can choose only one of the two alternatives basedon the confidence scores and the numbers of post-OCR engines thatproduce the two alternatives, respectively. In the above example, thealternative cluster that includes the entire image of the singlecharacter in a single bounding box can be chosen by the vote processingengine 1320 because more OCR engines produce that alternative cluster.

FIG. 14 shows another example OCR system that includes two or moremultiple OCR engines 1401, 1402 and a single post-OCR processing engine1420 in a voting configuration. The OCR engines 1401, 1402 operateindependently from one another to process the original imaged document1400 to produce their respective OCR outputs. The single post-OCRprocessing engine 1410 receives the OCR outputs and classify all clipimages in the received OCR outputs into clusters. A cluster can includeclip images from different OCR outputs and clip images in each clusterare used, e.g., by averaging the clip images, to generate a clusterimage to represent the cluster. Next, cluster images are generated andshapes of different clusters are compared to verify and correctassignments of OCR character codes of the clusters. This processproduces modified clusters. A vote processing engine 1420 is used to usethe modified clusters to generate the final OCR output 1430.

The vote processing engine 140 can, in one implementation, processesconflicting clip images for the same image instance at a particularlocation in the original imaged document 1400 generated in different OCRoutputs. The confidence scores for the conflicting images are comparedto select the clip image with a higher confidence score to represent theimage instance at the particular location.

Consider a more specific example of operations of the system in FIG. 14with two OCR engines 1401 and 1402 for processing the original imageddocument 1400 in parallel. The first OCR engine 1401 is used to processthe original document image 1400 to generate first OCR output. The firstOCR output includes first bounding boxes identifying first clip imageslocated in the document image and a respective one or more charactersassigned to each first clip image. The second OCR engine 1402 is used toprocess the document image 1400 to generate second OCR output. Thesecond OCR output includes second bounding boxes identifying second clipimages located in the document image and a respective one or morecharacters assigned to each second clip image. Next, the post-OCRprocessing engine 1410 is used to classify the first clip images and thesecond clip images into clusters, where each cluster includes only clipimages having the same one or more characters assigned to the clipimage. The post-OCR engine 1410 also generates a cluster image for eachcluster by, e.g., averaging clip images in the cluster. The abovegenerated cluster images are then used to correct the assignment ofcharacters to clip images and determine a confidence score for eachassignment of one or more characters to a clip image. The gray scaledata or color data from the original document image 1400 may beretrieved and used by the post-OCR engine 1410 to improve the clusterprocessing. The vote processing 1420 determines whether any one of thefirst clip images shares a location in the document image 1400 with anyone of the second clip images and the one or more characters assigned tothe one first clip image are different from the one or more charactersassigned to the one second clip image. If so, the vote processing 1420uses the respective confidence scores for the one first clip image andthe one second clip image to select one or more characters for thelocation.

The voting OCR systems shown in FIGS. 13 and 14 and their variations canbe implemented in one or more computer servers in a communicationnetwork. The one or more computer servers can be used to provide the OCRengines, the one or more post-OCR engine and the vote processing engine.A client computer in the network can send the document image to the oneor more computer servers to request for an OCR output of the document.The OCR engines, the one or more post-OCR engine and the vote processingengine on the one or more computer servers process the client's documentimage and produce the OCR output which can be sent to the clientcomputer through the communication network.

FIG. 15 shows an example OCR system that uses a first OCR engine 1510 toprocess the original document image 1500 and a first post-OCR processingengine 1520 to process the OCR output from the first OCR engine 1510 toproduce a modified OCR output. The first post-OCR processing engine 1520performs the cluster classification and clustering processing asdescribed above on the clip images output by the first OCR engine 1510and identifies each suspect word in form of a suspect cluster image fora cluster in which the image of the suspect word is present. A secondOCR engine 1530 is then used to further process any suspect charactersin the modified OCR output by verifying or correcting the assignment ofone or more OCR character codes for a suspect character and to produce afinal OCR output 1501. Notably, the second OCR engine 1530 canre-segment the images of the suspect clusters for further processing.

As an option, a second post-OCR engine may be used to further applyshape clustering to the output from the second OCR engine 1530 and theresult of this shape clustering is used to form the final OCR outputdocument 1501.

Post-OCR processing techniques can be used to generate high-resolutionprintout from low-resolution scans of a voluminous document. Somecommercial OCR engines can process images with a low resolution, e.g.,200 dpi or 300 dpi (dots per inch). Such low resolution images may beinadequate for high-quality printouts. The averaged images for theclusters in the post-OCR processing techniques described in the presentdisclosure tend to have a higher resolution than each individual imagein the scanned document due to the averaging over a large number ofimages in each cluster. In addition, Each clip image can be interpolatedto a higher resolution clip image. This interpolation further increasesthe resolution of the cluster image for each cluster. Therefore, thecluster images can be used to replace each instance of an image in thescanned document with a super-resolved version of the same image inhigh-resolution applications such as high-resolution print-on-demandsystems.

FIG. 16 illustrates one example process to produce a high-resolutionversion of a document. The image of the document is first processed toproduce a collection of sub regions of the image (step 1610). Each subregion is at a first resolution. The sub regions are at differentlocations in the image. One sub region may be completely separated froman adjacent sub region or may partially overlap with an adjacent subregion. The document can be in various formats, e.g., a collection ofmultiple sub documents such as articles in a common style in a book,newspaper or journal, and a multiple page document where each sub regionis a portion of one page of the document. An OCR engine, for example,can be used in this process to separate the image of the document intobounding boxes as the sub regions and each bounding box has anassociated clip image that is separated from the image of the document.The bounding boxes can be non-overlapping sub regions. Each sub regioncan include, in some implementations, color or grey scale data. The subregions are then processed to generate multiple clusters of visuallysimilar clip sub regions where each of the sub regions in the collectionis included in one of the clusters (step 1620). This process can beachieved by shape clustering, e.g., a hierarchical agglomerativeclustering algorithm which may use a k-dimension tree data structure.Each cluster can include only sub regions that are assigned the same oneor more particular characters by the OCR engine and are of approximatelythe same size. A representative cluster image is then generated for eachof the multiple clusters from the sub regions in the respective clusterat a second resolution higher than the first resolution (step 1630).Each cluster image can be generated by, e.g., interpolating each subregion in the first resolution into an interpolated sub region at thesecond resolution and by averaging the interpolated sub regions in eachcluster. Next, the sub regions in the image are replaced with thecluster images for the clusters in which the respective sub regions areincluded (step 1640). This replacement produces a replica image of thedocument which is at the second, higher resolution. The replica imagecan be printed at a printer to produce a high resolution printout of theoriginal document.

FIG. 17 illustrates an example high-resolution print-on-demand systembased the above process. A document is first digitized as a lowresolution image 1701. An OCR engine is then used to process the image1701 to produce an OCR output 302. A post-OCR processing engine 1710 isprovided to process the OCR output 302 in a low image resolution andproduce a modified OCR output document in a high resolution forprinting. The engine 1710 includes the cluster generation software 320and the cluster processing software 330 as in the post-OCR processingengine 310 of FIG. 3. Hence, clustering operations described above, suchas the processes illustrated in FIGS. 2, 4, 5 and 6 and the manualidentification processes, can be applied to produce the clusters 322 andthe modified clusters 332. Notably, the color or gray scale data fromthe original document can be used in the clustering process to captureimage details in the original document for rendering high-resolutioncluster images. Different from the post-OCR processing engine 310 ofFIG. 3, the engine 1710 includes a high-resolution interpolation engine1712 to perform an image interpolation on each image in the imaged inputdocument based on cluster images produced by the cluster processingsoftware 330 to produce final images 1720 at a desired high resolution.

In one implementation, the post-OCR processing engine 1710 can operateas follows. First, the cluster generation software 320 receives andprocesses the OCR output 302 with a low resolution of, e.g., 200 dpi or300 dpi to produce clusters 322. As an option, the cluster generationsoftware 320 can be used to obtain, from the original document, color orgray scale data for clip images for bounding boxes generated by the OCRengine 300. The color or gray scale data for each clip image is thenused by the cluster generation software 320 to generate the clusters322. Next, the cluster processing software 330 process the clusters 322to characterize or modify the clusters based on cluster shapes toproduce the modified clusters 332 with improved OCR accuracy. Thecluster processing software 330 can provide a manual identificationprocess, such as cluster-level manual identification methods describedabove, to verify or correct assignments of OCR character codes toselected cluster images, e.g., island clusters or other suspectclusters. The sliding window processing may also be applied to one ormore selected suspect clusters to segment each selected suspect clusterbased on cluster images of those of the clusters 332 that have highconfidence scores. After the clustering processing, the modifiedclusters 332 generally have improved confidence scores and enhanced OCRaccuracy in comparison with the initial clusters 322. The resolution ofeach of the modified clusters 332 is essentially the same as that ofeach of the clusters 322.

Next, the high-resolution interpolation engine 1712 applies an imageinterpolation algorithm to each clip image in each cluster and producesa high-resolution clip image for each clip image. Various interpolationalgorithms can be used, including bilinear interpolation algorithms. Asa result, all clip images are transformed into a resolution that ishigher than the resolution before the interpolation. As an example, a300-dpi clip image may be interpolated to a 1200-dpi clip image. Foreach cluster, the centroids of the interpolated clip images are computedand the interpolated clip images are aligned at their centroids. Thealigned interpolated clip images for each cluster are averaged toproduce an averaged image as the cluster image. Because of theinterpolation of each clip image and the averaging operation, thiscluster image has a higher resolution than the cluster image without theinterpolation. The high-resolution interpolation engine 1712 then useseach high-resolution cluster image to replace all image instances inthat cluster in the imaged input document to produce the high-resolutiondocument 1720 as a replica of the image of the input document. Thisreplica 1720 can be sent to a printer to print the document in the highinterpolated resolution.

The system shown in FIG. 17 can be implemented in one or more computerservers in a communication network. A client computer in the network cansend the low-resolution document image to the one or more computerservers to request for a high-resolution replica of the document image.The OCR engine and the post-OCR engine on the one or more computerservers process the client's document image and produce thehigh-resolution replica. The high-resolution replica can be sent to theclient computer through the communication network or be printed at aprinter connected to the communication network.

The disclosed and other embodiments and the functional operationsdescribed in this specification can be implemented in digital electroniccircuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including thestructures disclosed in this specification and their structuralequivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. The disclosedand other embodiments can be implemented as one or more computer programproducts, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructionsencoded on a computer-readable medium for execution by, or to controlthe operation of, data processing apparatus. The computer-readablemedium can be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readablestorage substrate, a memory device, a composition of matter effecting amachine-readable propagated signal, or a combination of one or morethem. The term “data processing apparatus” encompasses all apparatus,devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example aprogrammable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers.The apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates anexecution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., codethat constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a databasemanagement system, an operating system, or a combination of one or moreof them. A propagated signal is an artificially generated signal, e.g.,a machine-generated electrical, optical, or electromagnetic signal, thatis generated to encode information for transmission to suitable receiverapparatus.

A computer program (also known as a program, software, softwareapplication, script, or code) can be written in any form of programminglanguage, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can bedeployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module,component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computingenvironment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to afile in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a filethat holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in amarkup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program inquestion, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store oneor more modules, sub-programs, or portions of code). A computer programcan be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computersthat are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites andinterconnected by a communication network.

The processes and logic flows described in this specification can beperformed by one or more programmable processors executing one or morecomputer programs to perform functions by operating on input data andgenerating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performedby, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logiccircuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC(application-specific integrated circuit).

Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, byway of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, andany one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, aprocessor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory ora random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer area processor for performing instructions and one or more memory devicesfor storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will alsoinclude, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer datato, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g.,magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computerneed not have such devices. Computer-readable media suitable for storingcomputer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatilememory, media and memory devices, including by way of examplesemiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memorydevices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks;magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks. The processor andthe memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purposelogic circuitry.

To provide for interaction with a user, the disclosed embodiments can beimplemented on a computer having a display device, e.g., a CRT (cathoderay tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor, for displayinginformation to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device, e.g., amouse or a trackball, by which the user can provide input to thecomputer. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interactionwith a user as well; for example, feedback provided to the user can beany form of sensory feedback, e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback,or tactile feedback; and input from the user can be received in anyform, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input.

The disclosed embodiments can be implemented in a computing system thatincludes a back-end component, e.g., as a data server, or that includesa middleware component, e.g., an application server, or that includes afront-end component, e.g., a client computer having a graphical userinterface or a Web browser through which a user can interact with animplementation of what is disclosed here, or any combination of one ormore such back-end, middleware, or front-end components. The componentsof the system can be interconnected by any form or medium of digitaldata communication, e.g., a communication network. Examples ofcommunication networks include a local area network (“LAN”) and a widearea network (“WAN”), e.g., the Internet.

A c system for implementing the disclosed embodiments can include clientcomputers (clients) and server computers (servers). A client and aserver are generally remote from each other and typically interactthrough a communication network. The relationship of client and servercan arise by virtue of computer programs running on the respectivecomputers and having a client-server relationship to each other.

FIG. 18 shows an example computer system that implements OCR andpost-OCR processing. This system includes a communication network 1800that enables communications for communication devices connected to thenetwork 1800, such as computers. For example, the communication network1800 can be a single computer network such as a computer network withinan enterprise or a network of interconnected computer networks such asthe Internet. One or more OCR servers 1810 are connected to thecommunication network 1800 and provide (1) one or more OCR engines forOCR processing and (2) one or more post-OCR processing engines for thepost-OCR processing described in this specification. The one or more OCRengines for OCR processing may also be placed on different computerservers from one or more computer servers that provide the one or morepost-OCR processing engines. In operation, one or more client computers(e.g., clients 1801 and 1802) can use the communication network 1800 toremotely access the OCR server 1810 for OCR services. The client 1801,for example, can send a request to the OCR server 1810 for OCRprocessing of an imaged document. The client 1801 sends the imageddocument to the OCR server 1810. After receiving the imaged document,the OCR server 1801 directs the imaged document to one or more OCRengines for OCR processing. The OCR output from an OCR engine is thensent to a post-OCR processing engine for further processing to produce amodified OCR output. The OCR server 1810 then sends the modified OCRoutput to the client 1801. The high-resolution printing described inFIGS. 16 and 17 can also be implemented in the system in FIG. 18.

FIG. 19 shows an example computer system that provides an on-line OCRservice based on the above described OCR and post-OCR processing. Thissystem uses one or more OCR storage servers 1920 to store a searchablelibrary of OCR outputs for selected document images, e.g., selectedbooks and articles. A user can access the OCR storage servers 1920 tosearch for and retrieve the OCR text document for a particular documentof interest. The system includes a communication network 1900 thatenables communications for communication devices connected to thenetwork 1900, such as computers. For example, the communication network1900 can be a single computer network such as a computer network withinan enterprise or a network of interconnected computer networks such asthe Internet. One or more OCR servers 1910 are connected to thecommunication network 1900 and provide (1) one or more OCR engines forOCR processing and (2) one or more post-OCR processing engines for thepost-OCR processing described in this specification. The one or more OCRengines for OCR processing may also be placed on different computerservers from one or more computer servers that provide the one or morepost-OCR processing engines. Also connected to the communication network1900 are the one or more OCR storage servers 1920 that store searchablepre-processed OCR outputs by the OCR processing and post-OCR processingon the OCR servers 1910. A system management control is provided in thesystem in FIG. 19 to control the OCR and post-OCR processing on the OCRservers 1910 to provide OCR outputs to the OCR storage servers 1920. Thepre-processed OCR outputs in the OCR storage servers 1920 are indexedand cataloged for search and retrieval. As new OCR outputs for selecteddocuments are received from the OCR servers 1910, the database in theOCR storage servers 1920 is updated. In operation, one or more clientcomputers (e.g., clients 1901 and 1902) can use the communicationnetwork 1900 to remotely search or access the OCR storage servers 1920to retrieve a desired OCR output. The client 1901, for example, can senda request to the storage servers 1920 for OCR output of an imageddocument or can access the storage servers 1920 to search the databasefor the OCR output of the imaged document. If, the requested OCR outputexists in the storage servers 1920, the servers 1920 then send the OCRoutput to the client 1901. Otherwise, the client 1901 is notified thatthe requested OCR output is not currently available. The servers 1920can keep records of the OCR requests and the system management controlcan, based on the request records, control the OCR and post-OCRprocessing to process selected new document images that are requestedfor OCR service by users but their OCR outputs are not stored on theservers 1920. The high-resolution printing described in FIGS. 16 and 17can also be implemented in the system in FIG. 19.

While this specification contains many specifics, these should not beconstrued as limitations on the scope of any invention or of what may beclaimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particularembodiments. Certain features that are described in this specificationin the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented incombination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features thatare described in the context of a single embodiment can also beimplemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitablesubcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above asacting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, oneor more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excisedfrom the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to asubcombination or variation of a subcombination.

Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particularorder, this should not be understand as requiring that such operationsbe performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, orthat all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirableresults. In certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processingmay be advantageous. Moreover, the separation of various systemcomponents in the embodiments described above should not be understoodas requiring such separation in all embodiments, and it should beunderstood that the described program components and systems cangenerally be integrated together in a single software product orpackaged into multiple software products.

Thus, particular embodiments have been described. Other embodiments arewithin the scope of the following claims.

1. A computer-implemented method, comprising: classifying clip imagesdefined in a received OCR output of a document processed by an opticalcharacter recognition (OCR) process into a plurality of clusters of clipimages, each cluster including clip images that are assigned the sameone or more character codes by the OCR process, wherein the OCR processperformed on one or more computers generates the received OCR output;processing clip images in each of the plurality of clusters to generateexactly one cluster image for each cluster; classifying a first clusterin the plurality of clusters as a suspect cluster; identifying a nearestcluster to the suspect cluster, the nearest cluster being nearest basedon a shape distance between the cluster image for the nearest clusterand the cluster image for the suspect cluster; replacing the one or morecharacter codes assigned to the suspect cluster with character codesassigned to the nearest cluster at each occurrence of one of the clipimages of the suspect cluster in the OCR output to produce a modifiedOCR output; directing a cluster image of a selected cluster to anon-line server which is operable to direct the cluster image to one ormore users for manual identification of the cluster image, includingusing an on-line game provided by the on-line server to supply thecluster image of the selected cluster to the one or more users for auser response as part of the on-line game; and using manualidentification of the cluster image returned from the on-line server toverify one or more OCR character codes assigned to the selected clusteror assign new one or more OCR character codes to the selected cluster.2. A computer-implemented method, comprising: classifying clip imagesdefined in a received OCR output of a document processed by an opticalcharacter recognition (OCR) process into a plurality of clusters of clipimages, each cluster including clip images that are assigned the sameone or more character codes by the OCR process, wherein the OCR processperformed on one or more computers generates the received OCR output;processing clip images in each of the plurality of clusters to generateexactly one cluster image for each cluster; classifying a first clusterin the plurality of clusters as a suspect cluster; identifying a nearestcluster to the suspect cluster, the nearest cluster being nearest basedon a shape distance between the cluster image for the nearest clusterand the cluster image for the suspect cluster; replacing the one or morecharacter codes assigned to the suspect cluster with character codesassigned to the nearest cluster at each occurrence of one of the clipimages of the suspect cluster in the OCR output to produce a modifiedOCR output; directing a cluster image of a selected cluster to anon-line server which is operable to direct the cluster image to one ormore users for manual identification of the cluster image, includingusing an on-line service provided by the on-line server to supply thecluster image of the selected cluster as part of a challenge-responsetest; and using manual identification of the cluster image returned fromthe on-line server to verify one or more OCR character codes assigned tothe selected cluster or assign new one or more OCR character codes tothe selected cluster.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein: thechallenge-response test is for determining whether or not a user of theone-line service is a human.
 4. A computer-implemented method,comprising: classifying clip images defined in a received OCR output ofa document processed by an optical character recognition (OCR) processinto a plurality of clusters of clip images, each cluster including clipimages that are assigned the same one or more character codes by the OCRprocess, wherein the OCR process performed on one or more computersgenerates the received OCR output; processing clip images in each of theplurality of clusters to generate exactly one cluster image for eachcluster; classifying a first cluster in the plurality of clusters as asuspect cluster; identifying a nearest cluster to the suspect cluster,the nearest cluster being nearest based on a shape distance between thecluster image for the nearest cluster and the cluster image for thesuspect cluster; replacing the one or more character codes assigned tothe suspect cluster with character codes assigned to the nearest clusterat each occurrence of one of the clip images of the suspect cluster inthe OCR output to produce a modified OCR output; selecting a clusterimage of a cluster including a high confidence score as a cluster imagetemplate; aligning the cluster image template with a plurality ofdifferent portions within an image of a word in the received OCR outputalong a predetermined direction, one portion at a time; obtaining shapemetric distances between the cluster image template and the plurality ofdifferent portions of the word image, respectively; using the obtainedshape metric distances to determine whether a portion of the word imagematches the cluster image template; separating a matching portion of theword image that matches the cluster image template from one or moreother portions of the word image; and assigning one or more OCRcharacter codes assigned to the cluster to the separated matchingportion of the word image in the modified OCR output.
 5. Acomputer-implemented method, comprising: classifying clip images definedin a received OCR output of a document processed by an optical characterrecognition (OCR) process into a plurality of clusters of clip images,each cluster including clip images that are assigned the same one ormore character codes by the OCR process, wherein the OCR processperformed on one or more computers generates the received OCR output;processing clip images in each of the plurality of clusters to generateexactly one cluster image for each cluster; classifying a first clusterin the plurality of clusters as a suspect cluster; identifying a nearestcluster to the suspect cluster, the nearest cluster being nearest basedon a shape distance between the cluster image for the nearest clusterand the cluster image for the suspect cluster; replacing the one or morecharacter codes assigned to the suspect cluster with character codesassigned to the nearest cluster at each occurrence of one of the clipimages of the suspect cluster in the OCR output to produce a modifiedOCR output; selecting a first cluster image of a first cluster as acluster image template; aligning the cluster image template with aplurality of different portions within a second cluster image of asecond selected cluster along a predetermined direction, one portion ata time; obtaining shape metric distances between the cluster imagetemplate and the plurality of different portions of the second clusterimage, respectively; using the obtained shape metric distances todetermine whether a portion of the second cluster image matches thecluster image template; using a matching portion of the second clusterimage that matches the cluster image template as a new third clusterimage for a third cluster to be formed; separating a correspondingportion in each clip image in the second cluster that corresponds to thecluster image template to form a new clip image; using new clip imagesrespectively separated from the clip images in the second cluster toform the third cluster; assigning one or more OCR character codesassigned to the first cluster to the third cluster; using remainders ofclip images of the second cluster after separation of the new clipimages for the third cluster to form at least one fourth cluster; andusing the third cluster and the at least one fourth cluster to replacethe second cluster in producing the modified OCR output.
 6. The methodof claim 5, wherein: the second cluster image is an image of a ligaturerepresenting at least two language tokens for one or more languages usedin the document.
 7. A computer-implemented method, comprising:classifying clip images defined in a received OCR output of a documentprocessed by an optical character recognition (OCR) process into aplurality of clusters of clip images, each cluster including clip imagesthat are assigned the same one or more character codes by the OCRprocess, wherein the OCR process performed on one or more computersgenerates the received OCR output; processing clip images in each of theplurality of clusters to generate exactly one cluster image for eachcluster; classifying a first cluster in the plurality of clusters as asuspect cluster; identifying a nearest cluster to the suspect cluster,the nearest cluster being nearest based on a shape distance between thecluster image for the nearest cluster and the cluster image for thesuspect cluster; replacing the one or more character codes assigned tothe suspect cluster with character codes assigned to the nearest clusterat each occurrence of one of the clip images of the suspect cluster inthe OCR output to produce a modified OCR output; selecting a firstcluster image of a first cluster as a cluster image template; aligningthe cluster image template with a plurality of different portions withina second cluster image of a second selected cluster along apredetermined direction, one portion at a time; obtaining shape metricdistances between the cluster image template and the plurality ofdifferent portions of the second cluster image, respectively; using theobtained shape metric distances to determine whether a portion of thesecond cluster image matches the cluster image template; using amatching portion of the second cluster image that matches the clusterimage template as a new third cluster image for a third cluster to beformed; separating a corresponding portion in each clip image in thesecond cluster that corresponds to the cluster image template to form anew clip image; using new clip images respectively separated from theclip images in the second cluster to form the third cluster; assigningone or more OCR character codes assigned to the first cluster to thethird cluster; using remainders of clip images of the second clusterafter separation of the new clip images for the third cluster to form atleast one fourth cluster; using the third cluster and the at least onefourth cluster to replace the second cluster in producing the modifiedOCR output; obtaining shape metric distances between a cluster image ofthe fourth cluster and cluster images of other clusters; and assigningto the fourth cluster one or more OCR character codes assigned to afifth cluster that has a shortest shape metric distance from the fourthcluster among all other clusters.
 8. A computer-implemented method,comprising: classifying clip images defined in a received OCR output ofa document processed by an optical character recognition (OCR) processinto a plurality of clusters of clip images, each cluster including clipimages that are assigned the same one or more character codes by the OCRprocess, wherein the OCR process performed on one or more computersgenerates the received OCR output; processing clip images in each of theplurality of clusters to generate exactly one cluster image for eachcluster; classifying a first cluster in the plurality of clusters as asuspect cluster; identifying a nearest cluster to the suspect cluster,the nearest cluster being nearest based on a shape distance between thecluster image for the nearest cluster and the cluster image for thesuspect cluster; replacing the one or more character codes assigned tothe suspect cluster with character codes assigned to the nearest clusterat each occurrence of one of the clip images of the suspect cluster inthe OCR output to produce a modified OCR output; selecting a firstcluster image of a first cluster as a cluster image template; aligningthe cluster image template with a plurality of different portions withina second cluster image of a second selected cluster along apredetermined direction, one portion at a time; obtaining shape metricdistances between the cluster image template and the plurality ofdifferent portions of the second cluster image, respectively; using theobtained shape metric distances to determine whether a portion of thesecond cluster image matches the cluster image template; using amatching portion of the second cluster image that matches the clusterimage template as a new third cluster image for a third cluster to beformed; separating a corresponding portion in each clip image in thesecond cluster that corresponds to the cluster image template to form anew clip image; using new clip images respectively separated from theclip images in the second cluster to form the third cluster; assigningone or more OCR character codes assigned to the first cluster to thethird cluster; using remainders of clip images of the second clusterafter separation of the new clip images for the third cluster to form atleast one fourth cluster; using the third cluster and the at least onefourth cluster to replace the second cluster in producing the modifiedOCR output; soliciting manual identification of the cluster image of thefourth cluster from a person; and using the manual identification by theperson to generate new one or more OCR character codes for the fourthcluster.
 9. A computer-implemented method, comprising: classifying clipimages defined in a received OCR output of a document processed by anoptical character recognition (OCR) process into a plurality of clustersof clip images, each cluster including clip images that are assigned thesame one or more character codes by the OCR process, wherein the OCRprocess performed on one or more computers generates the received OCRoutput; processing clip images in each of the plurality of clusters togenerate exactly one cluster image for each cluster; classifying a firstcluster in the plurality of clusters as a suspect cluster, includingusing a number of clip images in each cluster and shape metric distancesof each cluster relative to other clusters to classify the plurality ofclusters into acceptable clusters and suspect clusters, wherein assignedone or more particular character codes for each acceptable cluster areused in a modified OCR output without further processing and assignedone or more particular character codes for each suspect cluster aremarked to be further processed; identifying a nearest acceptable clusterto the suspect cluster, the nearest acceptable cluster being nearestbased on a shape distance between the cluster image for the nearestacceptable cluster and the cluster image for the suspect cluster; andreplacing the one or more character codes assigned to the suspectcluster with character codes assigned to the nearest acceptable clusterat each occurrence of one of the clip images of the suspect cluster inthe OCR output to produce the modified OCR output when the cluster imagefor the nearest acceptable cluster has a shortest shape metric distancefrom the cluster image for the suspect cluster and the nearestacceptable cluster has a larger number of clip images than the suspectcluster.
 10. A computer-implemented method, comprising: classifying clipimages defined in a received OCR output of a document processed by anoptical character recognition (OCR) process into a plurality of clustersof clip images, each cluster including clip images that are assigned thesame one or more character codes by the OCR process, wherein the OCRprocess performed on one or more computers generates the received OCRoutput; processing clip images in each of the plurality of clusters togenerate exactly one cluster image for each cluster; classifying a firstcluster in the plurality of clusters as a suspect cluster, includingusing a number of clip images in each cluster and shape metric distancesof each cluster relative to other clusters to classify the plurality ofclusters into acceptable clusters and suspect clusters, wherein assignedone or more particular character codes for each acceptable cluster areused in a modified OCR output without further processing and assignedone or more particular character codes for each suspect cluster aremarked to be further processed; identifying a nearest cluster to thesuspect cluster, the nearest cluster being nearest based on a shapedistance between the cluster image for the nearest cluster and thecluster image for the suspect cluster; replacing the one or morecharacter codes assigned to the suspect cluster with character codesassigned to the nearest cluster at each occurrence of one of the clipimages of the suspect cluster in the OCR output to produce a modifiedOCR output; selecting a cluster image of the suspect cluster to bemanually identified by a person; using one or more manually generatedcharacter codes returned by the person for the selected suspect clusterto verify or replace previously assigned one or more particularcharacter codes for the selected suspect cluster; and reclassifying theselected suspect cluster assigned the one or more manually generatedcharacter codes as an acceptable cluster.
 11. A computer-implementedmethod, comprising: classifying clip images defined in a received OCRoutput of a document processed by an optical character recognition (OCR)process into a plurality of clusters of clip images, each clusterincluding clip images that are assigned the same one or more charactercodes by the OCR process, wherein the OCR process performed on one ormore computers generates the received OCR output; processing clip imagesin each of the plurality of clusters to generate exactly one clusterimage for each cluster; classifying a first cluster in the plurality ofclusters as a suspect cluster, including using a number of clip imagesin each cluster and shape metric distances of each cluster relative toother clusters to classify the plurality of clusters into acceptableclusters and suspect clusters, wherein assigned one or more particularcharacter codes for each acceptable cluster are used in a modified OCRoutput without further processing and assigned one or more particularcharacter codes for each suspect cluster are marked to be furtherprocessed; identifying a nearest cluster to the suspect cluster, thenearest cluster being nearest based on a shape distance between thecluster image for the nearest cluster and the cluster image for thesuspect cluster; replacing the one or more character codes assigned tothe suspect cluster with character codes assigned to the nearest clusterat each occurrence of one of the clip images of the suspect cluster inthe OCR output to produce a modified OCR output; directing a clusterimage of a selected suspect cluster to an on-line server which isoperable to direct the averaged image to one or more users that interactwith the on-line server and to solicit one or more manually generatedcharacter codes for the averaged image from the one or more users; usingone or more manually generated character codes returned from the on-lineserver to verify or replace previously assigned one or more particularcharacter codes for the selected suspect cluster; and reclassifying theselected suspect cluster assigned character codes corresponding to theone or more manually generated characters as an acceptable cluster. 12.The method of claim 11, wherein: the on-line server is operable toprovide an on-line game which supplies the averaged image of theselected suspect cluster to the one or more users for user responses aspart of the on-line game.
 13. The method of claim 11, wherein: theon-line server is operable to provide an on-line service and to supplythe averaged image of the selected suspect cluster as part of achallenge-response test to determine whether or not a user of theone-line service is a human.
 14. A computer-implemented method,comprising: classifying clip images defined in a received OCR output ofa document processed by an optical character recognition (OCR) processinto a plurality of clusters of clip images, each cluster including clipimages that are assigned the same one or more character codes by the OCRprocess, wherein the OCR process performed on one or more computersgenerates the received OCR output; processing clip images in each of theplurality of clusters to generate exactly one cluster image for eachcluster; classifying a first cluster in the plurality of clusters as asuspect cluster, including using a number of clip images in each clusterand shape metric distances of each cluster relative to other clusters toclassify the plurality of clusters into acceptable clusters and suspectclusters, wherein assigned one or more particular character codes foreach acceptable cluster are used in a modified OCR output withoutfurther processing and assigned one or more particular character codesfor each suspect cluster are marked to be further processed; identifyinga nearest cluster to the suspect cluster, the nearest cluster beingnearest based on a shape distance between the cluster image for thenearest cluster and the cluster image for the suspect cluster; replacingthe one or more character codes assigned to the suspect cluster withcharacter codes assigned to the nearest cluster at each occurrence ofone of the clip images of the suspect cluster in the OCR output toproduce a modified OCR output; selecting at least one acceptable clusterto use a corresponding cluster image of the selected acceptable clusteras a cluster image template; aligning the cluster image template with aplurality of different portions of a cluster image of a selected suspectcluster at a plurality of different positions along a predetermineddirection; obtaining shape metric distances between the cluster imagetemplate and each of the plurality of different portions of the clusterimage of the selected suspect cluster; using the obtained shape metricdistances for the cluster image template to determine whether a portionof the cluster image of the selected suspect cluster matches the clusterimage template; and separating a matched portion from the cluster imageof the selected suspect cluster as a new acceptable cluster which isassigned the one or more characters for the selected acceptable cluster.